Hi again,
Further to my eariler thread here:
http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=128115
I have been looking at the lens for my motorsport pics (formula 1). I have decided on the camera (Canon EOS 40D). I now have a few questions on the lens. I was advised to buy a Canon 70.300 IS but I dont know which one:
The choices are:
Canon EF 70-300 F/4 5.6 IS USM
http://www.jessops.com/Store/s30795...ortBy=UndefinedASC&IsInStockOnly=False&comp=y
for 379 pounds
or
CANON EF 70-300MM F4.5-5.6 DO IS USM
http://www.wilkinson.co.uk/store/product.php?productid=16297&cat=304&page=2
for 805 pounds.
My question is does the extra 400 pound+ make 'much' differance. As the differance I can see between the two is the 'DO' element.
Please can anyone help
Thanks
Crocc
Further to my eariler thread here:
http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=128115
I have been looking at the lens for my motorsport pics (formula 1). I have decided on the camera (Canon EOS 40D). I now have a few questions on the lens. I was advised to buy a Canon 70.300 IS but I dont know which one:
The choices are:
Canon EF 70-300 F/4 5.6 IS USM
http://www.jessops.com/Store/s30795...ortBy=UndefinedASC&IsInStockOnly=False&comp=y
for 379 pounds
or
CANON EF 70-300MM F4.5-5.6 DO IS USM
http://www.wilkinson.co.uk/store/product.php?productid=16297&cat=304&page=2
for 805 pounds.
My question is does the extra 400 pound+ make 'much' differance. As the differance I can see between the two is the 'DO' element.
Please can anyone help
Thanks
Crocc