lookit what I dug up

pixmedic

I am the Lord thy Mod
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
15,469
Reaction score
7,848
Location
Central Florida
Website
www.flickr.com
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
been digging through boxes lately with plans to toss a bunch of old camera stuff that has not been used in years. (decades for some) ran across this though, and I thought maybe it was worth saving from the garbage bin. the body needs cleaning. the light seals are gone. (hence the majority of the need for a cleaning)
the lens though (which I should have dusted off before taking the pictures) is in EX condition. no scratches, blemishes, oil, or fungus. A tiny amount of dust inside the lens at the front element, but hey...most older lenses do. aperture ring works flawlessly, and focus is nice and tight. (the way i like 'em)
this camera has the larger battery door to accommodate AA batteries instead of the version for AAA's.

I think this was in a box of stuff i got from my uncle years ago.
light seal aside, I believe everything on this camera was in working condition when i got it.
anyone have any experience with this camera? any feelings on this camera/lens combination?
i seriously doubt im going to use it, i don't imagine its worth taking in to have the light seals repaired, and
i have little to no interest in shooting film. I did a bit of google-fu, just to get a bit of 1980's nostalgia history on it, but if someone has a more hands-on visceral assessment of this camera, i would love to hear from you.
 

Attachments

  • PB230009.jpg
    PB230009.jpg
    480.5 KB · Views: 197
  • PB230008.jpg
    PB230008.jpg
    447.6 KB · Views: 214
  • PB230007.jpg
    PB230007.jpg
    380.6 KB · Views: 208
I think the 57mm f/1.2 lens is the cherry here. Might be really nice on a Sony NEX body. The FT-1 is from the early era of the integral film winding models--a transition that was met with disdain and apprehension, for the most part, for many,many years on the part of enthusiasts of that era. And there were some rather sketchy products made in this class, based on basically zero prior experience from the camera makers with BUILT-IN advance and interlock systems and power delivery. This camera was pretty much the beginning of the end-game for Konica. Konica always made solid cameras, but never could get much traction. Konica was a "shutter priority automatic" camera system; something that about half, or more, of amateurs mistrusted or disliked back in that era. There were multiple companies making good cameras back in that era, but of course, only three brand names survived, and one, Pentax, is really just a 'name-only' hanger-on.
 
Last edited:
I think the 57mm f/1.2 lens is the cherry here. MIght be really nice on a Sony NEX body.
if only I had a sony camera.
just have the Oly m4/3.
wonder if they make a konica AR to nikon F adapter.
doubtful i would use it anyway...would be manual focus...blech
 
woot!
4 AA batteries and 1 roll of film later and the camera does appear to be in fine working order.
(light seal aside of course) the automatic frame advance is fast. real fast. almost unsettling fast.
ah, the wonders of modern 1983 technology! gave the lens a good cleaning and it is in immaculate condition!
not a blemish on it, and barely a scratch on the barrel.
not a bad closet find. now to toss it back in a box.
 
Some envy here, it is a well regarded lens among collectors :) .
Consider that Nikon adapters should have some glass, because registration distance of Nikon is greater than Konica. This means that the real focal length will change, and quality depends on adapter. On the other side, on any mirrorless it should be ok. Or sell it for some hundreds dollars.
 

Most reactions

Back
Top