macro that didn't happen..c&c please

[dphotography]

i
do i need an extension.....i took this with my macro 0.25m/0.8ft .....efs 18-55mm....no extension..dont have any yet ..should i invest in some or do i need another lens ...what you guys recommend.thanks in advance for ur time

 

[WesternGuy]

Nice shots, I like the first one. The background in the second one is bit too distracting for me.

If you are just starting to investigate macro photogrpahy, you might want to get a set of extension tubes, like these - Kenko Auto Extension Tube Set DG for Canon EOS Lens AEXTUBEDGC They are a lot cheaper than a macro lens and will give you a definite feel for macro photography - you can then save up for a decent macro lens. Also, if you are going to get serious about macro photography, you will also need a good, sturdy tripod and a remote shutter switch - Canon Remote Switch RS-80N3 2476A001 B&H Photo Video . HTH.

______________________
WesternGuy

 

[dphotography]

Nice shots, I like the first one. The background in the second one is bit too distracting for me.

If you are just starting to investigate macro photogrpahy, you might want to get a set of extension tubes, like these - Kenko Auto Extension Tube Set DG for Canon EOS Lens AEXTUBEDGC They are a lot cheaper than a macro lens and will give you a definite feel for macro photography - you can then save up for a decent macro lens. Also, if you are going to get serious about macro photography, you will also need a good, sturdy tripod and a remote shutter switch - Canon Remote Switch RS-80N3 2476A001 B&H Photo Video . HTH.

______________________
WesternGuy

thanks ..thats what i kinda figured that i needed extensione tubes or a better lens..i was trying to get the tiny bugs inside the flower and no luck ...i also was thinking on the tripod cause i did have a hard time keeping the camera steady and it wouldnt take the shot ...i think i 'am heading towards portraits but macro photography is very interesting ..so who knows ...thanks for the info and i will look that up...i appreciate it

 

[SCraig]

If you are just starting to investigate macro photogrpahy, you might want to get a set of extension tubes, like these - Kenko Auto Extension Tube Set DG for Canon EOS Lens AEXTUBEDGC They are a lot cheaper than a macro lens and will give you a definite feel for macro photography - you can then save up for a decent macro lens. Also, if you are going to get serious about macro photography, you will also need a good, sturdy tripod and a remote shutter switch - Canon Remote Switch RS-80N3 2476A001 B&H Photo Video . HTH.

That really depends on what will be shot. True macro (1:1 ratio or larger) has such a narrow depth of field that virtually any movement will take the subject right out of focus. The slightest breeze on a flower and a tripod is just in the way. Tripods are great for staged shots with a non-moving subject however, in my opinion, for non-static subjects a lot of practice hand-holding the camera is more valuable. Insects are virtually impossible with a tripod unless they can be convinced to land in a specific spot (sugar water, honey, etc. help). A flash is also helpful since it can allow one to shoot at a smaller aperture and increase the depth of field. For static subjects focus stacking is also an excellent solution to the narrow depth of field issue.

I do agree about the Kenko tubes. They are very good and work quite well. I have 4 of varying lengths and can combine them as needed.

 

[dphotography]

If you are just starting to investigate macro photogrpahy, you might want to get a set of extension tubes, like these - Kenko Auto Extension Tube Set DG for Canon EOS Lens AEXTUBEDGC They are a lot cheaper than a macro lens and will give you a definite feel for macro photography - you can then save up for a decent macro lens. Also, if you are going to get serious about macro photography, you will also need a good, sturdy tripod and a remote shutter switch - Canon Remote Switch RS-80N3 2476A001 B&H Photo Video . HTH.

That really depends on what will be shot. True macro (1:1 ratio or larger) has such a narrow depth of field that virtually any movement will take the subject right out of focus. The slightest breeze on a flower and a tripod is just in the way. Tripods are great for staged shots with a non-moving subject however, in my opinion, for non-static subjects a lot of practice hand-holding the camera is more valuable. Insects are virtually impossible with a tripod unless they can be convinced to land in a specific spot (sugar water, honey, etc. help). A flash is also helpful since it can allow one to shoot at a smaller aperture and increase the depth of field. For static subjects focus stacking is also an excellent solution to the narrow depth of field issue.

I do agree about the Kenko tubes. They are very good and work quite well. I have 4 of varying lengths and can combine them as needed.

i definitely need to get a tripod no matter what ..for night pics ..it seems a tripod is a must to be able to achieve alot more ...i have learned allot in the couple of days i've been on this forum ....thanks for the info

 

[Frequency]

First one is very good...in the second how the second flower appears is very fine...but the defocused white pathways still disturb the image... actually it is this that makes this image of lesser quality

 

[dphotography]

First one is very good...in the second how the second flower appears is very fine...but the defocused white pathways still disturb the image... actually it is this that makes this image of lesser quality

i kinda figured that but i wanted to see what was gonna be the opinion on that....so macro photography the only focus should be the flower if thats what u r taking a pic of....nothing else but the object ...got it ...thanks