I didn't do anything to the sky, that's the way the sensor recorded it. (However, I might have used a GND... but this was taken a month or two ago and I really don't remember for sure.)3 would be great but sky is to blue for my taste.
Thanks very much Walter, I appreciate it.Good group Federico! I love the blue too.
Thank you, PF1 is the winner!their all really great though!
I suppose your personal little ridiculous war could be fought by PM instead. If you have anything to tell Bitter Jeweler, why don't you do it directly? (What's not to like about Bitter Jeweler's photos, by the way?)PUTS BITTER JEWELER TO SHAME!!!!
Shame I tell you!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks very much Walter, I appreciate it.Good group Federico! I love the blue too.
Thank you, PF1 is the winner!their all really great though!
I suppose your personal little ridiculous war could be fought by PM instead. If you have anything to tell Bitter Jeweler, why don't you do it directly? (What's not to like about Bitter Jeweler's photos, by the way?)PUTS BITTER JEWELER TO SHAME!!!!
Shame I tell you!!!!!!!!!!
I didn't do anything to the sky, that's the way the sensor recorded it. (However, I might have used a GND... but this was taken a month or two ago and I really don't remember for sure.)3 would be great but sky is to blue for my taste.
Thanks everybody for taking a look!
GND is an acronym that stands for graduated neutral density filter. Like I said earlier, I didn't do anything in post-processing to change the sky. That's how the sensor recorded it, and the GND filter (if I did use it) might have contributed some.It doesnt look like a sensor would record the sky like that.
What is a GND?
That's one of my few secret post-processing recipes. If I told you I'd have to kill youIm interested to know HOW to make the clouds appear with a 3d effect such as yours.