Model shoot.

[GWAC]

From a recent modeling session.

 

[D-B-J]

Lovely


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[CAP]

Portrait professional much?

 

[Derrel]

Portrait professional much?

Not sure what that smarty aleck comment is supposed to mean, for certain, but I have an idea... From my end, this appears to me to be barely retouched at all, and in fact MUCH of it looks literally un-touched. I see tons of "real detail" in her pores, and the ultra-fine hairs, and the lip texture, and so on. This does not look like "Portrait Professional" or any other overdone software.

What kind of monitor are you looking at this on CAP? Droid Razor M? Samsung Galaxy S4?

 

[GWAC]

Portrait professional much?

Way to open that mouth like you know what you're talking about when you don't have a clue...

SOOC:

 

[CAP]

Oh i meant no disrespect. :meh:

 

[GWAC]

This was a simple touch of Frequency separation with the healing brush set to lighten. It was a very simple and very minute amount of editing. And I didn't take it as disrespect, although calling my nearly untouched image a PP result is kind of a slap in the face

 

[Derrel]

This was a simple touch of Frequency separation with the healing brush set to lighten. It was a very simple and very minute amount of editing. And I didn't take it as disrespect, although calling my nearly untouched image a PP result is kind of a slap in the face

Yeah, I got the same exact feeling, that it was a totally off-base put-down effort and nothing more. Three-word questions are usually smart-alecky jabs.

 

[robbins.photo]

Portrait professional much?

Not sure what that smarty aleck comment is supposed to mean, for certain, but I have an idea... From my end, this appears to me to be barely retouched at all, and in fact MUCH of it looks literally un-touched. I see tons of "real detail" in her pores, and the ultra-fine hairs, and the lip texture, and so on. This does not look like "Portrait Professional" or any other overdone software.

What kind of monitor are you looking at this on CAP? Droid Razor M? Samsung Galaxy S4?

Obviously it's not "retina ready".. lol

 

[Tee]

Very nice. Good detail in the skin. In fact, my first thought was "Good, the skin looks natural".

 

[e.rose]

Portrait professional much?

Not sure what that smarty aleck comment is supposed to mean, for certain, but I have an idea... From my end, this appears to me to be barely retouched at all, and in fact MUCH of it looks literally un-touched. I see tons of "real detail" in her pores, and the ultra-fine hairs, and the lip texture, and so on. This does not look like "Portrait Professional" or any other overdone software.

What kind of monitor are you looking at this on CAP? Droid Razor M? Samsung Galaxy S4?

Obviously it's not "retina ready".. lol

Don't make me come over there.

 

[robbins.photo]

Not sure what that smarty aleck comment is supposed to mean, for certain, but I have an idea... From my end, this appears to me to be barely retouched at all, and in fact MUCH of it looks literally un-touched. I see tons of "real detail" in her pores, and the ultra-fine hairs, and the lip texture, and so on. This does not look like "Portrait Professional" or any other overdone software.

What kind of monitor are you looking at this on CAP? Droid Razor M? Samsung Galaxy S4?

Obviously it's not "retina ready".. lol

Don't make me come over there.

Lol.. should have known I wasn't going to sneak that one past.. rotfl

 

[Derrel]

e.rose has her search filter set for "retina ready", just to see if she gets any more flak for having to suffer through minor pixellation!

 

[GWAC]

Well, that escalated quickly.

 

[snerd]

I just want some pie.