multiple exposures results

[den9]

these were 3 or 5 exposures per frame (film) but i forgot to compensate my exposure. my question is how come this one came out super grainy compared to the other?

the sky looks perfect on the 2nd one, its out of focus and the mysterious grain. shot with 160iso

 

[den9]

anyone? take a guess?

 

[KmH]

No guess but I recognise Orion in the first image.

What film?

In #2 you also have some dark spots, horizontal banding and I was just wondering if all that is present in the negative, or if they are artifacts from a scanner.

 

[den9]

No guess but I recognise Orion in the first image.

What film?

In #2 you also have some dark spots, horizontal banding and I was just wondering if all that is present in the negative, or if they are artifacts from a scanner.

damn good eye on orion

is the banding the little strip you see above the trees on the 2nd photo? i havent look at the negative, i had these done at a lab.

i was using fuji pro 160, few months expired.

 

[Garbz]

Done at a lab blame the lab. Look at the frame. Is one brighter than the other? I know labs will typically brighten frames for you if they are too thin on the negatives, that always introduces noise.