What's new

My camera and PS are much smarter than I am

The_Traveler

Completely Counter-dependent
Joined
Dec 11, 2006
Messages
18,743
Reaction score
8,049
Location
Mid-Atlantic US
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
I was sitting in Red Emma's Coffeehouse in Baltimore and thought I'd see just how much my camera and PS could compensate for my relative ineptness so I snapped 6 pictures in rough pano orientation, keeping the aperture the same and allowing the camera to do what it would without my input. Then I loaded those images, without any further tinkering, into PS and let it merge them.

The result was disgustingly good, imo.

Red Emma's is an anarcho-socialist bookstore that has lately moved from a spot much nearer downtown near the Peabody Institute (music) into an area that is fast becoming an artsy hangout and is near MICA (art).
It is a bit incongruous that anarchists and socialists have joined in a business venture, not to mention their prices are high, although their coffee is good. Even more incongruous was that they closed early on Sunday for a business meeting. Their chocolate chip cookies look a bit non-traditional but taste excellent.


ke4u.jpg
 
Software is VERY good at finding similar patterns of data. The rectilinear distortion pattern is unappealing, but yeah, the software churned out a pano, as it was designed to do. We are blessed with amazingly sophisticated software these days, run on powerful computers which 15 years ago, would ALL have been classed as "supercomputers" which would not have been allowed to be sold to unfriendly foreign regimes, like North Korea, for example.

The iPhone 5 can make panos on whirls snapped with the camera held in one hand; the newly-announced Nikon D3300 now has a built-in multi-shot panorama assembly mode. Panoramic aligning and merging is one of the big new things. It has become something that can now be done with no human intervention needed.
 
Amazing what they can do.
my hubby just read me a quote from an article that 'in 1955, an IBM computer had 5 gig and was 5 ft tall and weighed 2000 lbs!" No my phone has more!
Derrell, I need one of those 'can be done with no human intervention' !
Nancy
 
  • Thread Starter 🔹
  • Banned
  • #5
Amazing what they can do.
my hubby just read me a quote from an article that 'in 1955, an IBM computer had 5 gig and was 5 ft tall and weighed 2000 lbs!" No my phone has more!
Derrell, I need one of those 'can be done with no human intervention' !
Nancy


My guess is that it was 5 megabytes not gigabytes.

In 1982, this was my computer
I set the switches to boot it.
Pdp-11-40.jpg
 
Thats funny. Those of us who are recent enough to this think a 11mp camera that can only shoot to iso 1250 is crap now because things have come so much further. This Terminator thing might not be so "sci fi" after all
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom