- Joined
- Dec 16, 2003
- Messages
- 33,896
- Reaction score
- 1,853
- Location
- Edmonton
- Website
- www.mikehodson.ca
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
The first thing I noticed in the first images, was the blurred tattoo and I didn't like it. Having said that, it does look too static in the 2nd version.
I think it's the arms, and not the tattoo that needs work though. Even in the first one, his elbows don't look blurred, even though the tattoo is. That looks unnatural because while the hands may be somewhat stationary, the elbows would have to be motion to get to this pose.
Maybe try it with more blur on the arms/elbows and less on the tattoo (than the first version).
I think it's the arms, and not the tattoo that needs work though. Even in the first one, his elbows don't look blurred, even though the tattoo is. That looks unnatural because while the hands may be somewhat stationary, the elbows would have to be motion to get to this pose.
Maybe try it with more blur on the arms/elbows and less on the tattoo (than the first version).