IronMaskDuval
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2014
- Messages
- 1,396
- Reaction score
- 506
- Location
- United States
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
I can't believe that I finally found a cheap hobby, and it's actually cheap! Ever since I started shooting with an mft system, I started to use legacy lenses, primarily Minolta MD lenses. I loved the form factor of the mft, but I hated the god awful 4:3 aspect ratio. I took a break from photography for a bit so that I could recollect myself and try to cure myself of GAS. Since I've been back, I decided to dive straight into mirrorless once again, and I bought a Sony A7.
To be honest, I'm glad that I got the dslr kick and GAS out of the way, because I think the A7 will be my permanent camera for years to come. I shoot primarily portraits and candids, so I loved the full frame form factor and the awesomeness of subject background separation that it gives. Moreover, I love the quasi retro look of the A7, but mostly, I love the fact that I can shoot and make full use of legacy lenses and that's where the cheap hobby comes in.
My wife loves to go to every antique and thrift store in town. I absolutely hate it and am dreadful of the thought of the weekend coming up, because it meant that I would have to go. Well, these days, going is a joy, because I always find wonderful manual lenses that so many people pass by because they do not know any better, or their cameras are no better off with them.
The Sony A7 however can pew them all, and because of that and cheap adapters on Amazon, I joyfully go thrift and antique shopping with my wife. Last week, I picked up a Pentax Super-Tak 1:2/55 for a whopping $35 otd. I was considering the purchase of the Sony 55 1.8, but the $1,000 difference or so just didn't make sense, especially since the perceived gains from the Sonnar are, I believe, marginal. I spent $15 on a Nikkor 50 f/2 and so on and so on. Some time ago when I bought my Bogen tripod, the couple that sold it to me were photographers, and they made me take two boxes of old photography equipment with me for free. In it, I found a Minolta Rokkor MD 85 1.7, worth about $350.
You just can't beat the deals and the quality lenses that you can find from the old and often times forgotten past. I would even argue that some, if not many, of the lenses produce better photographs than today's optics.
To be honest, I'm glad that I got the dslr kick and GAS out of the way, because I think the A7 will be my permanent camera for years to come. I shoot primarily portraits and candids, so I loved the full frame form factor and the awesomeness of subject background separation that it gives. Moreover, I love the quasi retro look of the A7, but mostly, I love the fact that I can shoot and make full use of legacy lenses and that's where the cheap hobby comes in.
My wife loves to go to every antique and thrift store in town. I absolutely hate it and am dreadful of the thought of the weekend coming up, because it meant that I would have to go. Well, these days, going is a joy, because I always find wonderful manual lenses that so many people pass by because they do not know any better, or their cameras are no better off with them.
The Sony A7 however can pew them all, and because of that and cheap adapters on Amazon, I joyfully go thrift and antique shopping with my wife. Last week, I picked up a Pentax Super-Tak 1:2/55 for a whopping $35 otd. I was considering the purchase of the Sony 55 1.8, but the $1,000 difference or so just didn't make sense, especially since the perceived gains from the Sonnar are, I believe, marginal. I spent $15 on a Nikkor 50 f/2 and so on and so on. Some time ago when I bought my Bogen tripod, the couple that sold it to me were photographers, and they made me take two boxes of old photography equipment with me for free. In it, I found a Minolta Rokkor MD 85 1.7, worth about $350.
You just can't beat the deals and the quality lenses that you can find from the old and often times forgotten past. I would even argue that some, if not many, of the lenses produce better photographs than today's optics.