NEX 7 at 3200iso

[o hey tyler]

Derrel uses canon too. Check out his blog. The camera stats mean next to nothing as far as photography. They just make things more convenient. They're right. You don't understand photography whatsoever. Too have too much of an equipment fetish. Means you're a noob and will always be nothing but a noob.

<Another facepalm>
That's what I said to these guys before. You don't understand what's going on in here, so why butt-in? Are you here to act as Tyler and Nikon_Josh savior?

Sensor stats mean something? Why can't you tell that to Tyler who started this argument? Scared? lol

Sensor stats don't mean anything when you have no comprehension of how photography works. Like yourself. That's what everyone's saying. You're just too thick headed to grasp that concept.

 

[argieramos]

I'm out. There's never been a bigger moron or failure in this forum than Argie. It's too pathetic for me

Excuses. You just can't handle me. You, Tyler, and Josh are gettiing killed here.

All the evidence that I posted doesn't lie. Canon sensors are outdated. Like I said, Canon best APS-C and semi-Pro level camera, the 7D is inferior to the worst mirrorless of Sony, the NEX-3 in terms of Image quality. You can't deny the fact. lol

Actually, one Pro that I know think Canon is the new Kodak! Ouch! Bwuahaha!!

 

[o hey tyler]

I'm out. There's never been a bigger moron or failure in this forum than Argie. It's too pathetic for me

Excuses. You just can't handle me. You, Tyler, and Josh are gettiing killed here.

All the evidence that I posted doesn't lie. Canon sensors are outdated. Like I said, Canon best APS-C and semi-Pro level camera, the 7D is inferior to the worst mirrorless of Sony, the NEX-3 in terms of Image quality. You can't deny the fact. lol

Actually, one Pro that I know think Canon is the new Kodak! Ouch! Bwuahaha!!

I don't know if you realize this, but you're the only person with this backwards logic. The 7D is all around a better camera than the Nex 3, and the entire Nex series. You can even compare them on your favorite site Compare digital cameras - Snapsort

Canon doesn't include all sorts of gimmicky features like "in camera hdr" or "swing pano" because they're just that, a gimmick. You'll get much better HDRs if you process them yourself with a bracketed exposure, and you'll have a much better pano if you take your own shots on a tripod.

Again, I don't expect you to know that. Because it's like a fan of "House MD" trying to argue that it's Lupus... Every single time. Guess what? It's never lupus.

 

[argieramos]

Correction, I'm not learning anything from you, because you can barely piece a sentence together or cite facts.

I'm glad you don't have aspirations of becoming a professional photographer, because it would end poorly.

It's clear that I understand photography, because I know it revolves around capturing light. You think it doesn't matter how much light there is, as long as you have a 'good' sensor. When in fact that couldn't be further from the truth.

I AM THE ONE who brought up a camera argument? That's hilarious.

You are entirely correct. The photographer is the one that makes the difference, and you are not a photographer... Instead, you're an 18 year old who struggles to keep drool from running down your chin.

PS. Derrel shoots both Canon and Nikon. Fail argument fails.

How is that fail? I bet he hate his canon. He is the one who brought up this Canon sensors are behind Sony issue. You have objection? Talk to him.

Yes you are learning something from me. Remember first you were dissing Sony cameras. Then I posted something about how a very good photographer with not so good camera will beat a moron using the 1DX. Look what you are saying in this thread now. You learned that from me. lol

 

[o hey tyler]

Yes you are learning something from me. Remember first you were dissing Sony cameras. Then I posted something about how a very good photographer with not so good camera will beat a moron using the 1DX. Look what you are saying in this thread now. You learned that from me. lol

What are you talking about?

I don't usually say this, but have you been screened for a learning disability?

I'm the one saying "without knowledge of photography, it doesn't matter how good your camera is." I would be the good photographer with a 10D and a 50mm f/1.8, and you'd be the moron with the Sony A900, or A77 (your pick!), and I'd still take better photos.

Heck, I take dumps with better aesthetic composition than the photos you take... and then I flush them down the toilet.

 

[argieramos]

That's funny, because I delivered high quality magazine prints for the interior designer of the Flagship Timberland stores. He did one in NY, and several overseas. London, Paris, Oslo, Hamburg, etc. If he can use my photos for a magazine, or lager prints, I'm pretty sure that constitutes a professional photo.

But what would you know? You can't even operate a camera. Much less take a photo worthy of a magazine.

Go out and practice photography. Get your head out of your ass.

Seriously? I am not a pro but not very impressed with your work. I have seen way better photos from your troll buddy Gary and Derrel. You are not even close to
them. lol

Let me tell you what, you can make fun of my ability. You think I care? It doesn't change the fact that you are using a canon camera. Ewwww! Bwuahahahaha

 

[argieramos]

Sensor stats don't mean anything when you have no comprehension of how photography works. Like yourself. That's what everyone's saying. You're just too thick headed to grasp that concept.

Why didn't you start this debate then?
You changed your claim because you found out Canon cameras are inferior and you have no other way to prove otherwise? lol

Everybody know it is the photographer who makes the difference. Funny, you didn't know that before.

But yea, you will do better with a camera that is not a canon.

 

[o hey tyler]

Sensor stats don't mean anything when you have no comprehension of how photography works. Like yourself. That's what everyone's saying. You're just too thick headed to grasp that concept.

Why didn't you start this debate then?
You changed your claim because you know Canon cameras are inferior? lol

Everybody know it is the photographer who makes the difference. Funny, you didn't know that before.

But yea, you will do better with a camera that is not a canon.

I've been making this claim from the get-go. You're the one all high and mighty about how you NEED THE ULTIMATE SENSOR TECHNOLOGY. Which of course, you don't realize is far from the truth.

 

[argieramos]

I don't know if you realize this, but you're the only person with this backwards logic. The 7D is all around a better camera than the Nex 3, and the entire Nex series. You can even compare them on your favorite site Compare digital cameras - Snapsort

Canon doesn't include all sorts of gimmicky features like "in camera hdr" or "swing pano" because they're just that, a gimmick. You'll get much better HDRs if you process them yourself with a bracketed exposure, and you'll have a much better pano if you take your own shots on a tripod.

Again, I don't expect you to know that. Because it's like a fan of "House MD" trying to argue that it's Lupus... Every single time. Guess what? It's never lupus.

Duh! The 7D overall is a better camera. The ergonomics, the control, etc. I am talking about the IQ the sensor can give.
7D is way inferior to the NEX-3
http://www.resensor.com/2011/07/nex-3-vs-7d-who-will-win/

You see that? 7D result looks sh** compare to the Nex-3 bwuahahahaha!!

Call the auto-HDR and sweep pano gimmicks. Having something like that is better than not having at all. Have fun with your boring Canon. lol

 

[2WheelPhoto]

argieramos, where do you come up with these replies? Do you believe your chatter?

 

[argieramos]

What are you talking about?

I don't usually say this, but have you been screened for a learning disability?

I'm the one saying "without knowledge of photography, it doesn't matter how good your camera is." I would be the good photographer with a 10D and a 50mm f/1.8, and you'd be the moron with the Sony A900, or A77 (your pick!), and I'd still take better photos.

Heck, I take dumps with better aesthetic composition than the photos you take... and then I flush them down the toilet.

Do you remember what you were posting on the first a77 thread when we first argue about this matter? If you are saying now is true, why did you start that damn argument? you need to see your doctor lol

 

[argieramos]

I've been making this claim from the get-go. You're the one all high and mighty about how you NEED THE ULTIMATE SENSOR TECHNOLOGY. Which of course, you don't realize is far from the truth.

Now you didn't. Go back to the a77 thread. Are you suffering from amnesia?

 

[mjhoward]

Can someone just ban this instigator already???

 

[argieramos]

Can someone just ban this instigator already???

Just because you don't agree with me doesn't mean I should be banned. What did I do wrong? Give me a list.

I am open to more friendly discussion. You guys started this.

 

[mjhoward]

You guys started this.

I believe you started instigating with the 5th post in the thread. Nobody else had up to that point.

That made your 1D MkII shot at that ISO looks like was taken by a point and shoot camera lol.