Hello from frozen Maine
I stumbled onto this thread via Google. I am so fond of my NYIP course that I was Googling the term "better than NYIP" - curious if there was a better photography course.
I have the sets 1955, 1977, 1987, and 2003 of the NYIP photography course, I am goo goo for them. I also have "understanding exposure" and a few other books, I'd like to get the Ansel Adam's book mention here too, that guy is so cool
So .. let's see .. let's talk about "outdated"
Outdated?
A photography book that's outdated? Is it possible? While my NYIP 1955 is still en route, I can tell you photography hasn't changed since 1977 (that's my oldest photography course)
"Hasn't changed since 1977?" Yes, I said that.
Photography, mechanically speaking, is :
ISO, aperture, and shutter speed.
Then comes all the other stuff like composition and all that.
So if photography is those three things, then why do you need a book that was written in 2009 ? Photography has been those three things since 1977 (I can confirm this) and probably even longer.
So .. let's see .. let's talk about "$900"
Well that's a lot of green I'd rather spend on an AF-S lens (I love Nikon glass)
So how can we get this NYIP thing for less? Well like all things in this world NYIP courses come from
eBay ! That's how I got 1955, 1977, 1987, and 2003 sets
Here is how NYIP works :
1. You pay a lot of green
2. They give you the course books, along with some videos and audio.
3. You get assigned a teacher - Here is what you miss by bootlegging the course.
The teacher is a real photographer and he will critique your photos.
"How can I get a real photographer to critique my photos?"
Well that's easy, post your images in a photography forum and you'll get a whole slew of critique from real photographers and n00bs alike. It's like having 100 teachers! I've been doing it with PhotoCamel.com but who knows? Maybe I'll defect to this forum?
So, you've got your NYIP course, 100 "teachers", what else ?
Homework!
I have the book sequence and homework assignments

I'll list them in the next post.
Cool huh?
"so what's the difference between the 1977, 1987, and 2003 sets?"
Well there isn't much difference. What if I took a great photography book from 1960 and updated the words a little bit : "Groovy" is removed. "Digital camera" is added, do you see?
Aperture, shutter speed, and ISO (or film speed) in relation to focal length is almost timeless.
So really any set is good. I like my 1987 set best I think. It's retro

from childhood (I'm 32 years young)
Cheers,
Craig