keith .. i have a question re: your very helpful info.. to make it even simplier, for myself anyway...
Based on what size I would like the photo to be, is determined by changing the ppi only.. that simple? And I will not even mess with the pixel size for printing.. ?
(I just posted a thread asking a similar question.. you're very helpful!)
No, it's not that simple. Sorry.
A
rule-of-thumb used in the industry is that for a print made from a digital image to have the same print quality as a print made from film, the digital image needs to be printed at a resolution of 300 ppi.
As a practical matter the visual difference between a 200 ppi print and a 300 ppi print is very close to nil.
So the
no part of my answer means that as you decrease the ppi value to make the print larger, you also decrease the visual quality of the print to one extent or another. The quality of the native image has a lot to do with the range ppi can be decreased to achieve a larger print.
The other part of the
no answer has to do with the aspect ratio of the image. Most digital SLR cameras make images in a 3:2 aspect ratio, the same aspect ratio of 135 film (35mm). The long side of the image is 1.5x the length of the short side (4x6, 6x9, 8x12).
An 8x10 is a 5:4 aspect ratio, the long side is only 1.25x the length of the short side.
To make a 5:4 aspect ratio print (8x10) from a 3:2 aspect ratio image (8x12), you have to crop some off the long side of the 3:2 aspect ratio image.
If you didn't shoot the image in anticipation of cropping later, you could wind up being forced to crop away something important in the image to get to 8x10.
You can't just resize one side of the image in an image editor because it will introduce distorion.