I much prefer the original to the edited version. The edited version would have made me say "this is underexposed". His fur looks well exposed in the original version, maybe allowing for a few more highlights even, only is composition too centred, but that would have been my only complaints.
The edited version is too dark.
Well, I am known for not lighting vignetting, but that is only one thing. It is way darker than the original and his fur looks "dirty" there.