Portrait Lens (Maybe Macro Too?)

Discussion in 'Canon Cameras' started by rap77oh, Nov 2, 2015.

  1. rap77oh

    rap77oh TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    10
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    So, like many of us, most of my photo gigs are portraits. I mainly shoot with my 24-105mm f/4L for portraits (on the long end) and I use that lens (almost) exclusively for my wedding videography. I am starting to get more work as a wedding photographer and thought getting a great prime portrait lens that also has macro abilities would be a great combo for weddings.

    So with portraits being the primary driving factor, give me your wisdom on these lenses for photos:
    • Canon 85mm f/1.8
    • Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro
    • Canon 100mm f/2
    • Tokina 100mm f/2.8 Macro
    • Tamron 90mm f/2.8 Macro
    • Sigma 105 f/2.8 Macro
    • Something else I haven't thought of???
    Thanks!

    OOOPS- Realized I posted in the Camera thread and not the lens thread. Sorry but I can't figure out how to delete it or move it.


     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2015
  2. Derrel

    Derrel Mr. Rain Cloud

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    43,199
    Likes Received:
    16,469
    Location:
    USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Macro lenses are usually not very good portrait or field telephoto lenses. The focusing mechanism in all macro lenses that I have ever seen (except the MF Zeiss macros) have HAIR-TRIGGER focusing movement beyond about three feet. The focus on some can go from Infinity to 3 meters in as little as three to four millimeters of focusing ring movement. AF systems work on a "close enough" type of system...take a tele-macro or short macro out and use it for a full portrait session and you'll soon see the results disappoint, with MANY more OOF shots than a field tele will absolutely nail, dead-on in focus.

    Tamron 90...has this problem. Canon EF 100/2.8 internal focus model has this problem. Sigma 180/3.5 EX HSM has this problem. Nikkor 55 and 60 2.8 macros have this issue...and the list goes on.

    I cannot imagine using a tele macro for videography at weddings...no way. I would always look at something designed for people work.

    I would strongly consider the Canon EF 100/2 as a nice people lens; a friend from years ago had one and it is an awesome people lens....truly a gorgeous imager, yet it has almost no following!! Probably because it does not have the L-series red ring, but it is a lens that creates really lovely images.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. rap77oh

    rap77oh TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    10
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I figured that must be the case (I've never used a Macro). It's weird that nobody seems to talk about the 100 f/2. I am currently leaning that way.
     
  4. Designer

    Designer Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2012
    Messages:
    17,462
    Likes Received:
    4,451
    Location:
    Iowa
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    You can just send a mod a PM note, and the mod can move it.
     
  5. Designer

    Designer Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2012
    Messages:
    17,462
    Likes Received:
    4,451
    Location:
    Iowa
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    You have four of them listed in your signature. And you want a fifth one to use for something for which it may only be marginal at best. (see Derrel's post)

    IMO, there's nothing wrong with a professional-quality zoom, so why have you decided against a zoom?
     
  6. Punisher911

    Punisher911 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2014
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Warren, Michigan
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    [/QUOTE]You have four of them listed in your signature. And you want a fifth one to use for something for which it may only be marginal at best. [/QUOTE]

    He doesn't even have a signature line. He listed a set of choices for us to give him our opinions on....

    On topic though, the OP didn't mention what camera he is using. Full frame or crop.... I wouldn't personally try to use a macro lens for portraits and vice versa. For a FF camera, I would shoot for a 85mm for portraits though.
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2015
    • Like Like x 1
  7. rap77oh

    rap77oh TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    10
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I have a 6D and the 24-105mm f/4L. I will be adding something between the 85-100mm focal length for portraits (as that's the range I like taking portraits at currently). It seems like I should ditch the macro idea for the time being and just grab a solid portrait lens. It'll either be the 100mm f/2 or 85mm f/1.8 (most likely).

    And yes, I was listing lenses I was considering. I don't own those.
     
  8. Punisher911

    Punisher911 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2014
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Warren, Michigan
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    6D? I'd go with the 85mm for portraits for sure then. Then save up for the 100 macro later. lol
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Derrel

    Derrel Mr. Rain Cloud

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2009
    Messages:
    43,199
    Likes Received:
    16,469
    Location:
    USA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit


    I think you'd probably find the 85mm/1.8 Canon EF to be the handier, more-versatile lens, especially now that we have high-megapixel, high-resolution cameras that allow some post capture cropping without much loss of image quality. The 85 gives you the wider angle of view, which can be cropped down to simulate a 100mm angle of view pretty easily.
     
    • Like Like x 1

Share This Page