Grandpa Ron
Been spending a lot of time on here!
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2018
- Messages
- 1,192
- Reaction score
- 735
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
After restoring a 1910 view camera I inherited from my uncle, through lots of trial and error, I have been able to produce some decent 4x5 negatives. I scan them on a desk top scanner, printer, copier with a an external light source and process them with a minimal post processing (exposure and contrast) with good results. My next step is to contact print them on my Uncles 50's vintage Kodak ABC Photo Lab contact printer.
Though it only uses a 7 1/2 watt bulb, the exposure time was usually 5 seconds or less. Therefore, I places layers of white copy paper between the bulb and the negative to absorb some of the light reaching the paper . This increased the exposure time to 10 to 20 seconds.
The problem is, I seem to have lost the mid tones. Here is the data.
The swing negative has plenty of foreground detail.

The swing digital print also has foreground detail.
The contact print with 3 seconds exposure has looks to light with the foreground washed out.

The contact print with 9 seconds exposure has the background okay (about the same as the digital photo) but again the foreground washed out.
I thought that if I increased the exposure even longer the background would be too dark.
The paper Arista EDU grade 3, the developer is Arista EDU photo paper developer. Unlike an enlarger, I cannot change the aperture for more light, without dismantling the unit and removing the paper sheets; so my only variable is exposure time, which is controlled by an electronic timer. I also noticed the negative is reversed.
So my questions are,
* Would increasing the light output (removing some paper) give me more mid tones than increasing the exposer time?
* Would there be a lot more mid tones with grade 2 paper?
* What else am I over looking?
At this point I am just trying to get a contact print with the tone latitude about the same as the digital print. I would appreciate any suggestions
Though it only uses a 7 1/2 watt bulb, the exposure time was usually 5 seconds or less. Therefore, I places layers of white copy paper between the bulb and the negative to absorb some of the light reaching the paper . This increased the exposure time to 10 to 20 seconds.
The problem is, I seem to have lost the mid tones. Here is the data.
The swing negative has plenty of foreground detail.

The swing digital print also has foreground detail.

The contact print with 3 seconds exposure has looks to light with the foreground washed out.

The contact print with 9 seconds exposure has the background okay (about the same as the digital photo) but again the foreground washed out.

I thought that if I increased the exposure even longer the background would be too dark.
The paper Arista EDU grade 3, the developer is Arista EDU photo paper developer. Unlike an enlarger, I cannot change the aperture for more light, without dismantling the unit and removing the paper sheets; so my only variable is exposure time, which is controlled by an electronic timer. I also noticed the negative is reversed.
So my questions are,
* Would increasing the light output (removing some paper) give me more mid tones than increasing the exposer time?
* Would there be a lot more mid tones with grade 2 paper?
* What else am I over looking?
At this point I am just trying to get a contact print with the tone latitude about the same as the digital print. I would appreciate any suggestions