lostprophet
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2006
- Messages
- 11,793
- Reaction score
- 184
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
- Thread Starter 🔹
- #16
Can we diss on the 1.4x converter still? Just kidding
Actually I'm glad to see these nice shots as I have been considering try one one, thanks.
Regards,
Peter Witham
not used a 1.4x ... yet, its on my ever growing list of bit I wantLP I think I've run out of words to describe how awed I am by your photos.
well as long as you don't start saying you've had enough of them, I'll keep posting
Those are very nice! I have been thinking about a purchase but haven't heard good things.. thank you for setting me more at ease.
no problem
The only thing I can see wrong with any of these is the dodgey wet brown things in the last 2 shots......
you know Ian I might just use you as food for the Bears next time I head over to Whipsnade
Well, I guess I'm going against the weight of opinion, but I think the pics are lovely!! (Poo on the naysayers)
Edit: oh, and I agree with Hoppy.
thank you and pull the otter one! I saw how impressed you were with the London Otters
me too hehe he's my hero!![]()

My 2x converter is pretty cool and doesn't mangle up images I hope to trade it in for a pretty white canon one in the not to distant future though![]()
Just remember the white Canon ones only work on their white lenses apart from the 200mm F2.8 135mm F2 and the 180mm F3.5 macro
Oh WHY did you have to say THAT!!!!!
Ian, people bow to me
its all part of being a member of the LPAS, Lostprophet Appreciation Society. Remember membership is free for the first 6 monthsjeez finally someone speaks up for extension tubes and tele-converters!
yeah there are bad tele's out there . . . just like there are bad lenses.
that doesn't mean there aren't good ones though.
extension tubes. . . whats the argument people give for lost quality on that?
got a bit carried away with that, no one has said anything bad about tubes
you can clearly see these were all taken with a TC. The quality is bad, lack of contrast etc etc....humbug :er:
I wish i had money, i would buy it all in an instant.
All of the pics are great..........again :thumbup:![]()
cheers mateGreat Shots!! #2,3 &6 are my favorites.
thank you
Great work salvaging those awful photos. He He LOL With a good matched tele and the right lens, there is no issue with quality. I think a lot of the bad rap is most shooters don't use a rigid enough tripod when focal lengths get long. That and the slower shutter speed due to the loss of 2 stops just takes a little thought to get past. The results are obviously worth it. Again, good job, great pix. Really impressed by the frog and fox pix. ( a fox is so darn hard to get close to )
many thanks, closest I've been to a fox in the wild was about 300meters and that was just awesome!