SWFLA1, I certainly respect your opinion and understand completely where you're coming from. To families these things happen to, seeing it in print can feel like a double tragedy. But we didn't run the story to sell papers. That story was HARD, both emotionally and physically. I never push anyone. Sometimes, they want to talk about the person. Other times, they want to be left alone and that is certainly fine. I cried WITH the woman in that picture as she spoke to me about her relationship with one of the children. She spoke because she trusted me, and I owned up to my responsibility of a human being first.
Now the "why."
Over the past few months, our state nearly tripled the record for teenagers dying in automobile accidents. I took a day off after this story to emotionally recoup. The day I came back, a 17-year-old was killed in another accident and I had to cover that one, too. So did printing the first story help prevent further accidents? Some could argue no, but that accident was entirely different. My point is that we write about the tragedies not to sell papers but to at least try to let people know what's going on (at least on the editorial level). I'm sorry about your loss. I hope I haven't come across wrong.
Edit: If anyone would like to read the story, I can post it when I get home.