Have to laugh, one post, and he can verify the contest.
Well I guess someone will have to come in here with some evidence then, huh?

I've been checking in on this thread for weeks now and still can't believe that no one has ever tried to prove that the site
is not a scam. Seems it was guilty until proven innocent from the very beginning!
Originally, BoblyBill posted asking whether anyone had entered into the contest due to his reluctance to believe in another one after being duped before. Not one person replied with any kind of substantial evidence it was a scam, or was not. Simply because BoblyBill was afraid it was true, several other people assumed it was and perpetuated the suspicion without trying to support it:
Taking a look at the site, did anyone even click the Better Business Bureau link
on the top of the front page? It's front and center on the contest website. Looking at the BBB's
report of the business you immediately see the site and business are registered to Studio 414, Owned by Jessica Mealey, and given an A- rating only because it is a relatively newer business [2008].
Okay so it's backed by the Better Business Bureau, so what? It's still gotta be a copyright scam!
Except for the bold font two-thirds of the way down the page, just below the Contest Entry and Winning Announcement links. This section is devoted to relaying all of the rules and copyright information involved, putting to rest that fear as well, "
Photographers retain all copyright to their images."
When you go to the original photography website,
www.studio414.com, you can see the address of the studio, phone number, and name of the owner, Jessica Mealey, again. It's really not that hard to google-map the address to see it does exist, and even the phone number to see if it leads to that address.
And they do.
Now I know this is nothing concrete itself, but when you look at her website, it's strange that someone trying to work an easy scam would go through all the trouble to make up a fictitious persona, studio address, or phone number and two websites linked together. Not to mention all of these names, addresses, and phone numbers align with the Better Business Bureau's own records.
Now let's say the BBB logo, link and report are fake, and the studio414.com websites to the owner's personal business and contest are also a fake. What about the several Grand Prize winners of the contests who now have their own personal photography websites linked-to via Studio 414's contest website? Clicking the Winner's Gallery shows several of these all under totally different names, and does not link to stock photo sites. How much effort would someone really put into creating a scam contest where names, addresses, contact numbers, emails addresses, photos, BBB reports, and winning contestant websites all need to be fabricated, linked and consistently used throughout?
Simple.
Studio 414's contest is not a scam!
and how do we know that the "winner" isn't a friend of the person running the contest?
Again, a simple answer for a simple question:
I am a recent winner of the contest, and here are my brand new photos taken by the FREE Canon EOS 5D Mark II camera to prove it:
Flickr: C Double W's Photostream And this is thescreenshot I took of the Winner's Gallery the night I discovered I had been selected:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/cdoublew/3310047989/
My website
CDoubleW Photography -- Chris Williams- powered by SmugMug is linked to in the Winner's gallery, and was also mentioned several times in Studio 414's newsletter, which anyone can sign up for when they enter the contest.
By allowing incorrect assumptions to turn into false accusations, this forum and plenty of others actively discourage potential entries, that could turn out to be winners, by simply letting this negative and incorrect thread exist. Now I don't work for, or belong to anything affiliated to Studio 414 other than being a hand picked winner on February 23rd, but I feel I owe them at least this much in helping the future of the contest where more people aren't turned away by misinformation and lies. I would like to at least thank Moglex for trying to stay objective through this whole thread and not jumping on the bandwagon. And hope anyone looking to try their luck in the contest will try it out and submit their own photographs. Yes there is a risk you'll lose your $8.00 and may not be selected, but it's a contest not a giveaway. It took me several months before I submitted a winning entry, from Novmber until February, and obviously it has paid off! A few times I even paid a $35 entry fee per image to see if I'd land a place in the winner's gallery. I knew it would give me a great start as far as confidence in my ability and exposure to my work, and all it took was patience and some entry fees.