What's new

Should I swap lenses?

cwcaesar

TPF Noob!
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
307
Reaction score
52
Location
Middle Tennessee
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
I recently got a used 12-24mm f/4 lens to go with my d7000. I have a 50mm, which seems a bit tight at times, and a 70-300mm. I got the wide angle so I could get a bit wider, but it is a lot wider than I really need. It is a good lens and all, but I am thinking about swapping it out for the new 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5. I think that the 24mm would be wide enough for me and it would fill in a lot of gaps; it could even do for a walk around lens.

I guess I am mostly looking to see if anyone has used this new lens on a crop sensor. How does it compare to the much more expensive 24-70mm? Plus, I am looking to have all my glass full frame compatible, and the 12-24mm is DX only.


What would you do? I am pretty sure that the 12-24 is being returned. What should I replace it with?

Thanks.


Edit: (Mods, I just saw the 'lenses' sub-forum. Could you please move this thread to there? Thanks.)
 
My suggestion would be a 35mm prime. The problem you have is with the 50mm being too long for your general walk around use. 35mm is a much more "normal" focal length for the D7000. Or, just get a cheap little Nikon 18-55 kit lens, even though it may feel like a toy, its' IQ is pretty good.
 
With 50mm and 70-300mm, I would probably get a D600 or a used D700, instead of a new lens.
 
I recently bought a used 17-55 f2.8 and it's the best lens I've ever owned... if you're DX, a used one can run your $850.00.
But outside of that... do try the 35mm f1.8 for it's awesome.
 
Lots of people don't like the 24-70mm'ish range lenses on DX bodies.. Personally, i had an old 28-70mm on my DX body for years and loved it (until it died a horrible death in mexico).

Keep in mind the new 24-86mm f/3.5-4.5 is a 'Kit Lens'... I'm sure its a fine lens but something with a fixed aperture would be better.

I would look at the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8. It's a great range, nice and sharp and has a constant f/2.8.

UWA's like the 12-24mm are very hard to use. It takes some learning/playing to get the hang of them.. Every time i think of selling mine i talk myself out of it. The few times a year i use it i'm always glad i still have it :)
 
Thanks for all of the suggestions. I to intend to get a D600 eventually, but I will have to start making money from my hobby before I can justify that to the wife. In the mean time, I will continue to stock up on some FX glass.

I do want a 35mm f/1.8 so I went to Adorama and was ready to check out. I even had a UV protective filter selected to go with it. Before I checked out I decided to look at the used lenses. What I found was a 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 for only $75 more than the 35mm. This is the older one without the VR, but I thought that was still a good price for one in 'E' condition. So I got this lens instead. Maybe I will get the 35mm after Christmas.
 
If FX is where you will eventual go, then your selection is wise. Of course with your current 7000, 24 mm may not do a lot of job especially indoor shoot a group photo
 
Lots of people don't like the 24-70mm'ish range lenses on DX bodies.. Personally, i had an old 28-70mm on my DX body for years and loved it (until it died a horrible death in mexico).
i love my 24-70 on DX, that being said, it seems to me a better range on FX but to each his own, great lens if you can afford the pretty penny regardless of what body its on
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom