CorrieMichael
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2012
- Messages
- 447
- Reaction score
- 166
- Location
- Canada
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Yeah.. what are the white specs? This is gorgeous as is but the little bit of a tree or whatever in the top right I'd prob crop out. Submit in like an 8x10 ratio maybe and boom, gone! But you get to keep all of your flare at the top still.
Yeah.. what are the white specs? This is gorgeous as is but the little bit of a tree or whatever in the top right I'd prob crop out. Submit in like an 8x10 ratio maybe and boom, gone! But you get to keep all of your flare at the top still.
Yeah.. what are the white specs? This is gorgeous as is but the little bit of a tree or whatever in the top right I'd prob crop out. Submit in like an 8x10 ratio maybe and boom, gone! But you get to keep all of your flare at the top still.
It is like a floating dust brush I made.......... Is it bad? lol
Really excellent points Tim, especially the note about the composite aspect; that never even occurred to me!Overall this is a very nice image... but I did want to mention two things:
1) ditch the dust specs
What I immediately noticed is that these are photoshop'd in. True dust/pollens would have some of those specs in focus, but most would be out of focus to varying degrees... they should have blurred, but they don't (you just need some cottonwood trees... the right locations around here can look like it's snowing in june.)
But unless something is entered as a "composite image" (elements exist in the image which were not actually present in real-life) then I give any such a image a huge ding in judgement ... because I immediately wonder "what else" wasn't really there in real-life. If the image is being judged in a category in which adding elements is permitted (many photo contests have strict rules -- at least in some categories -- as to what types of modifications / adjustments are permitted and some will even demand to see the original out-of-the-camera non-processed image.)
Interesting; as soon as I read this, I went back and spent about five minutes looking at the image, and I don't see it (pun fully intended). I think the way the eyes are captured now adds a quiet intimacy to the image which would be lost if it were changed.2) And this is a nit... but I do wish I would have been able to see the children's eyes. Both of them have their eyelids closed or squinted.

)