sigma 10-20 & canon 50/1.8 -OR- sigma 20/1.8

Discussion in 'Photography Beginners' Forum' started by theregoesjb, Jan 25, 2012.

  1. theregoesjb

    theregoesjb TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    150
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    boston
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    getting my first DSLR soon (either canon t2i or t3i), I have borrowed my fathers rebel 8mp XT a bit and used his kit 18-55 lens and his canon 50mm 1.8.

    ive pretty much decided ill get just the t2i body and then get the canon 50mm 1.8 to start, which i really like for its speed and sharpness.

    my plan was to then at some point get the sigma 10-20mm because i want a wide angle lens for outdoor photography

    I am wondering if it would be worth killing two birds with one stone though and get the sigma 20mm 1.8 lens. its not quite as wide as 10mm but 20mm is still pretty good

    any thoughts on this?


     
  2. analog.universe

    analog.universe TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,923
    Likes Received:
    330
    Location:
    Vermont
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    The Sigma 10-20 f/3.5 is quite a nice lens and would be my recommendation. From what I understand the 20mm 1.8 is very soft, and vignettes so heavily that shooting at 1.8 doesn't even collect as much light as you'd expect from that aperture. I'd suggest reading a bunch of tests for each lens so you can see how they actually perform. All the reviews I've read recommend against that 20mm unfortunately :-/. If you want to shoot wide landscapes, you'll also be much happier at 10 than 20.
     
  3. DiskoJoe

    DiskoJoe Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    4,540
    Likes Received:
    519
    Location:
    Houston
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    get the 10-20 its handy. Your dad will probably let you borrow the 50.
     
  4. DiskoJoe

    DiskoJoe Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    4,540
    Likes Received:
    519
    Location:
    Houston
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I highly recommend the 3.5. It costs more but is worth the money. Incredibly sharp for a wide angle.
     
  5. theregoesjb

    theregoesjb TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    150
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    boston
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    thanks for the responses, I meant the sigma 10-20 f4-5.6, i actually didnt even realize that there was a 3.5 until this post. Hope that doesn't change too much..

    feel free to add thoughts about the difference between the two if you have used both
     
  6. analog.universe

    analog.universe TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2011
    Messages:
    1,923
    Likes Received:
    330
    Location:
    Vermont
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit


    The 4-5.6 is ok for the money I suppose, but the 3.5 really is quite superior... I haven't used both, but I researched all the crop UWA's extensively. I ended up deciding on the Tokina 11-16 f/2.8, because of it's sharpness and distortion characteristics. The Tokina 12-24 f/4 is also pretty nice in your situation, gives you a bit more range until you get to 50. Unfortunately these are all more costly than 10-20 f/4-5.6. I personally would wait and save up for one of the nicer options if need be.
     

Share This Page