Sigma 150-600mm Sports or Nikon 200-500

Discussion in 'Photography Equipment & Products' started by rajiv.dey1, Aug 25, 2016.

  1. rajiv.dey1

    rajiv.dey1 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Hi,
    I am lil confused over deciding on two lenses Sigma 150-600mm Sports and Nikon 200-500 mm

    I am getting the following offer

    1)Nikon 200-500 $1179.28 (US Dollar)

    2) Sigma 150-600mm sports version with USB Dock $1940.59 (US Dollar)

    3)Sigma 150-600mm sports version with Sigma TC1401 (1.4x USB Dock) $2164.50 (US Dollar )

    Which one i should go for I own Nikon D750

    explanation with taking photographs and its difference would be very helpful but not madatory

    Thanks in advance


     
  2. DarkShadow

    DarkShadow Birdographer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2013
    Messages:
    7,923
    Likes Received:
    3,992
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I would recommend if you can test them both. The Sigma sport is 2 pounds heavier then Nikon at 6 pounds where Nikon is 4 pounds so something to consider if you plan on hand holding. I also think the sigma is more versatile In focal range and IMO since your shooting FF D750 that extra 100mm reach is a plus especially if you have wildlife shooting in mind.
     
  3. rajiv.dey1

    rajiv.dey1 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I have tested Nikon 200-500 mm it seems heavy but manageable unfortunately I am not getting Sigma 150-600 mm sports on rent my hard luck.. yes I have wildlife in mind.. :)
     
  4. DarkShadow

    DarkShadow Birdographer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2013
    Messages:
    7,923
    Likes Received:
    3,992
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I shoot with the 150-600mm sigma contemporary version that sits around 4 pounds same as the Nikon 200-500 and its very manageable. I hand hold always and carry it around for hours.I would not want the extra weight of the sport version so I went with the contemporary version for Nikon Mount along with the USB Dock for calibrations and firmware updates. The dock already paid its self off for three firmware updates and very minor calibrations.
     
  5. rajiv.dey1

    rajiv.dey1 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    Mostly i am going to rent tamron 150-600 on 11th september.. let me myself compare the result with Nikon 200--500 fortunately I will be in the same blackbuck reserve to shoot so same shooting condition.. I have seen your protfolio its wonderful as I shoot mostly early hours I have to shoot Hight ISO 4000 i see some noise in mine but yours is crystal clear any tips you got for me and what is your thought on TC-1401 1.4x tele converter is it worth buying
     
  6. DarkShadow

    DarkShadow Birdographer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2013
    Messages:
    7,923
    Likes Received:
    3,992
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I think you will be pleased with either one.The only tip I really can give is try to shoot In similar lighting for comparison and compare the VR of the Nikon to OS of the Sigma just see which one has a better stabilization system this may help for the time you may want to shoot slower shutter speeds hand held and of course which lens feel better for in its handling Hope to see some images you get which ever beast of a lens you choose.Thanks For the Compliment.
     
  7. rajiv.dey1

    rajiv.dey1 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    What is your thoughts on teleconverter tc1401 1.4x
     
  8. DarkShadow

    DarkShadow Birdographer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2013
    Messages:
    7,923
    Likes Received:
    3,992
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    I won't use one but I can't say how it would work.
     
  9. John Hunt

    John Hunt No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2014
    Messages:
    709
    Likes Received:
    601
    I shoot with a D750 and the Sigma 150-600 sport. It is a great combo to work with. I hand hold it all the time without any issue. I would not recommend putting any teleconverter on it, the image quality will suffer and autofocus will only work in very bright light. Renting the Tamron will give you an idea of the size and focal length but the performance of the two lens is very different.
     
  10. PaulWog

    PaulWog No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2013
    Messages:
    1,153
    Likes Received:
    188
    Location:
    Canada
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    These lenses are not made for teleconverters. You are better off cropping in after.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. nerwin

    nerwin Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2015
    Messages:
    3,486
    Likes Received:
    1,434
    Location:
    Vermont
    Honestly, I'd just get the Nikon 200-500 VR. Why? Because its a fixed f/5.6 and that means you can add the TC-14E 1.4x Teleconverter which means you'll get whopping fixed f/8 280-840mm (if my math is right, but it's probably wrong lol) zoom range which is crazy.

    Just a thought anyways. Also..its a Nikon lens so if you decide wildlife photography isn't your cup of tea, the resale value holds a lot better than Sigma or Tamron (in my opinion).
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. rajiv.dey1

    rajiv.dey1 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit


    Thanks by the way they say f8 teleconverters work fine
     

Share This Page