Sky Pics

[dolfan]

#1

#2

#3

#4

 

[Jamiebear]

I love #3 the best because it shows the rooftop, nice pics

 

[dolfan]

I love #3 the best because it shows the rooftop, nice pics

Thank you for the reply, I too like #3 the most, just because it has the most color and shows the jets path the best I guess...Thanx..
Bob

 

[[JR]]

Just wondering... how's this for number 3?

Few levels adjustments, colour balance and brightness.

 

[JH2008]

I like! I thought some were a bit bland but that is an improvement. Good Job.

 

[dolfan]

As you can tell I am a newbie , I have not played with alot of editing...just taking the shots..
Bob

 

[dolfan]

This one any better ya think?

 

[Scott7117]

What was the ISO set at?

 

[dolfan]

What was the ISO set at?

I don't know I went with the sunset setting on the camera.....Real newbie here just finding out , or trying to find out all the options with this new E-410..
Bob

 

[LaFoto]

Well, the EXIF-data of this very newest submission to the thread says:

ISO 200, which may be set to too high for this kind of camera already, though I don't know. By the look of things, it was set to too high already and there already is a lot of noise.

No matter how pretty a night sky can be, it needs an "anchor", something to go with it, ground or trees or houses, else it is boring.

And that third photo (first post) has most of that, which is why most said they liked that one best.

However, I feel your camera - on its automatic sunset settings - quite considerably under-exposed your photos!