What's new

Some Random Macro Shots

07Vios

TPF Noob!
Joined
Mar 3, 2012
Messages
317
Reaction score
20
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
Got bored, and still no flowers or bugs out yet.


Second try at water drops (only posting a couple of pics), added more lighting, and yet it still wasn't enough.
$66982_10200835637079563_1744186467_n.webp

$65903_10200835639039612_730928913_n.webp


Just an LED (this was at ISO 100, so I'm not sure why there's noise)
$535455_10200853240719643_1569731125_n.webp


My laptop screen (of the white portion of the page on the forums here)
$487302_10200853480525638_1027622801_n.webp

Cropped of the pic above
$480416_10200853480325633_1468247252_n.webp



All pics were manually focus, and linked from my facebook (so it's been degraded in terms of IQ).
 
Last edited:
There's visible noise in the shadows or underexposed areas even at ISO100. Full frame cameras with lower pixel density often handle noise better at low ISOs and especially at high ones.
 
There's visible noise in the shadows or underexposed areas even at ISO100. Full frame cameras with lower pixel density often handle noise better at low ISOs and especially at high ones.

Is that always the case (that much noise at ISO100-200)? I've never noticed it before until shooting macro pictures. I noticed the same noise on someone's macro picture of a flower, but he was using ISO800 on a 5D3 (he was disappointed that there was that much noise, although the 5D3 is still my ideal camera that I want as of right now).
 
Is that always the case (that much noise at ISO100-200)? I've never noticed it before until shooting macro pictures. I noticed the same noise on someone's macro picture of a flower, but he was using ISO800 on a 5D3 (he was disappointed that there was that much noise, although the 5D3 is still my ideal camera that I want as of right now).

It is always the case. Noise is much more prevalent and noticeable in darker areas of the image. Without seeing the photo from the 5D3, it's impossible to say. Probably user error.
 
Is that always the case (that much noise at ISO100-200)? I've never noticed it before until shooting macro pictures. I noticed the same noise on someone's macro picture of a flower, but he was using ISO800 on a 5D3 (he was disappointed that there was that much noise, although the 5D3 is still my ideal camera that I want as of right now).

It is always the case. Noise is much more prevalent and noticeable in darker areas of the image. Without seeing the photo from the 5D3, it's impossible to say. Probably user error.

It was handheld, iirc, so maybe you're right. But still, I remember reading that the 5D3 has a high acceptable ISO. Looks like I'll be trying to limit darker areas when ever possible until I can afford a 5D3. haha.
 
Here's another shot:

$528338_10200867414353975_1356230767_n.webp


And again, withe the noise. This was ISO 100 again (I think I used center weight metering, and still clipped the highlights pretty bad, should have just used full manual).
$312314_10200866750057368_1270857184_n.webp
 
$33963_10200894683955698_269027495_n.webp

$542819_10200894688195804_619080684_n.webp



Using my HTC One X with a DIY "macro lens." First one is of a key, and the second one is a dime. No editing, straight from the phone.
 
$421867_10200894748877321_556353210_n.webp

$734542_10200894819559088_1703750432_n.webp
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom