Sparrow Shot with a Bigma

[DarkShadow]

Still undecided about it and it;s consistency of sharpness but it's probably me though. This was @ 500mm 1/800 f 7.1 ISO 1250 +1EV
IMG_0938 by DarkShadow191145, on FlickrIMG_0938 by DarkShadow191145, on Flickr12450423693_d702a612ee_b by DarkShadow191145, on Flickr
2
12450423693_d702a612ee_b-1 by DarkShadow191145, on Flickr12450423693_d702a612ee_b by DarkShadow191145, on Flickr

 

[JacaRanda]

Still undecided about it and it;s consistency of sharpness but it's probably me though. This was @ 500mm 1/800 f 7.1 ISO 1250 +1EVIMG_0938 by DarkShadow191145, on Flickr

Doesn't it get ridiculous? In a good / bad way.

I can clearly see breast feathers overlapping wing feathers. To me that is tack sharp. Maybe focus is in that area?

 

[DarkShadow]

It sure does need lots and lots of light but I knew this already. Maybe I am spoiled with my L Glass that takes no effort to get tack sharp pictures or the need for sharpening in Post unless I shoot in raw of course.

 

[JacaRanda]

Maybe I am spoiled with my L Glass that takes no effort to get tack sharp pictures or the need for sharpening in Post unless I shoot in raw of course.

That 70-200F4L IS is my first lens that made me go WOW, what a difference. I have not used it much lately, but it is still my favorite lens.

 

[Bryan Pereira90 13]

looks sharp to me too, not sure if its my monitor but the contrast settings look very different on the shots, i think somewhere between the two would be nice, well captured!

 

[MSnowy]

Nice to me. When I had the 150-500 it was sharpest at f8 at just under 500mm

 

[ShootRaw]

Nice..Never heard of Bigma thou...

 

[DarkShadow]

looks sharp to me too, not sure if its my monitor but the contrast settings look very different on the shots, i think somewhere between the two would be nice, well captured!

They are different to me to. I may have bumped one up more then the other or lighting had changed. Fixed there closer now.

 

[DarkShadow]

Thanks for the comments guys.