Alpha
Troll Extraordinaire
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2005
- Messages
- 5,451
- Reaction score
- 41
- Location
- San Francisco
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
I would definitely take a look at David Hockney's stitching work. I have a poster of Pearblossom Highway in my apartment, and it's awesome. Here it is:
http://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth/hockney/hockney.pearblossom-highway.jpg
A word on the resolution. If you stitch images together, you have more pixels but the same resolution. Resolution refers to the number of pixels in a given surface area. Say you have an image that's 10x10 pixels. That's 100 square pixels. If you stitch four of those images together, that's 400 square pixels, but in a 20x20 pixel canvas, which makes the resolution identical. Even if you were to overlap them, such that the final image was, say, 20 pixels wide by 10 pixels tall, that's 200 square pixels but still the same resolution. Stitching iamges together only increases the image's total number of square pixels, not the number of pixels in a given surface area.
http://www.ibiblio.org/wm/paint/auth/hockney/hockney.pearblossom-highway.jpg
A word on the resolution. If you stitch images together, you have more pixels but the same resolution. Resolution refers to the number of pixels in a given surface area. Say you have an image that's 10x10 pixels. That's 100 square pixels. If you stitch four of those images together, that's 400 square pixels, but in a 20x20 pixel canvas, which makes the resolution identical. Even if you were to overlap them, such that the final image was, say, 20 pixels wide by 10 pixels tall, that's 200 square pixels but still the same resolution. Stitching iamges together only increases the image's total number of square pixels, not the number of pixels in a given surface area.