Well.....yeah. I thought by using the word "experiment" I was being clear, but maybe not.
K, it's just an image of this cute little stone bridge in a nearby park, on a sunshiny day with dense shade around. Challenge #1. :roll:
YES - I was only trying to see if an image was even possible using this S-L-O-W Konica IR film (rated at 50) in a toy camera with a set shutter speed of 100 and very little in the way of controls. I could have stepped outside my house and shot anything, but I thought if I was in a park setting I would get more foliage, the better to test those IR effects.
SO - yeah, I actually got a couple of images (the rest of the roll is pretty unusable, I was too slow with the shutter release cable). The images even have the outer vignetting that the Holga is known for (what you called "streaking" effect, Haarper). I thought it was a pretty good first try. Oh, and my husband commented on the "grayness" of the film in the darkroom, too (it expired 2/04) so that didn't do anything to help. Someone mentioned the high contrast; Konica is a pretty contrasty film, with a tight grain.
I was wondering if anyone had a suggestion at this point as to which might help it along: the more opaque red filter, or the neutral density. :scratch:
My only aim is to be able to use the Holga, with those (I think, anyway) nifty Holga effects, with IR film, since HIE is not an option, and my husband's face takes on a strange expression when I start playing with his Rolleiflex.
I guess I should ask, did you have anything in mind whilst taking these shots, are was this just an experiment to see how miss holga and mister konica would get it on during their first date?
That pretty much sums it up, sweetie.... I think a second date is in order, with fresher film and some other filter combo. If I HAVE to drag ass back to Oakland Cemetery I suppose I will.
