For this image, which is obviously going for an ominous, overbearing feel, I think the original works best...
Yes, I agree...the well-corrected image Bynx posted has had excellent keystoning correction applied...and in some ways it DOES look better after his re-work. But I am not as fond of the more-precise,more-measure composition Bynx created by lopping off that right hand light pole's second lamp...the re-work looks more "controlled" and "studied", like a careful shooter shot it, whereas VIP's original shot had a more offhand, casual, 1920's feel to it...I think in a technical sense, Bynx's rendering of the source material (an effects-processed image file) is an excellent job, and that VIP's rendering of the source material (ie the hotel itself!) was not quite as well-composed as maybe it could have been.
The problem as I see it is those poles, and the way the camera was angled upwards...some people HATE keystoning....buildings and wine bottles and light poles that appear to be
"falling over backwards" gets into an aspect of lens rendering that MANY people realllllly have strong feelings about. I think vipgraphix's original shot has just enough keystoning to look offhand and unstudied, but NOT enough to look super-creative and "cool".Using an entirely different focal length and a different camera placement (ie, HIGHER, like ladder-high), OR a camera with movements, or a tilt-shift lens, or maybe a 16mm rectilinear fisheye, would have made this shot and effect AWESOME....
BTW, I absolutely love that old,distressed, sepia tone "look"...looks fantastic on this California vintage architecture + palm trees. How about a re-shoot??? FABULOUS location for this processing/exposure treatment.
EDIT: As I was writing this, vipgraphixs posted his OWN re-work!!! ACK! I type too slow!