- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 5,279
- Reaction score
- 5,171
- Location
- Oregon
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
I thought you hated DR.I like the amount of detail you were able to keep while having the face in shadow. Good job.
I don't even know what DR is, but thanks for the compliment.I thought you hated DR.I like the amount of detail you were able to keep while having the face in shadow. Good job.
The irony of your statement is that he used a 5d MK1 and through skill and practice he was about to accomplish that.
Thank you. I enjoy hearing that perspective. It's not one that I would normally notice in an image (blood makes me sick), but after you explained it I can certainly see and appreciate it. I love hearing all of the different ways an obscure portrait can be interpreted.Nicely done, Dan. The final image is actually both appealing and disturbing. The clarity with which you show the eyes pulls you in. The shadow on his right side (our left) creates a certain disquiet. The branch shadows come across as drips of blood running down his face (I know they are not, but that was the impression I had when I saw the image). And yet, despite the "blood" his look is tranquil and direct. The processing and conversion have emphasized these elements and (to me) make it a very powerful portrait.