unpopular
Been spending a lot of time on here!
Crooked - Really I didn't mean to be insulting, it's just that, as you know there is so much misunderstanding about metering out there. Clearly this isn't the case here.
It's important that you remember to mention that what you are saying is the case if you leave the meter on center weighted, average or are using an incident meter. With spot metering you can place any reference into any zone.
In the case of the second example I would meter off the hilight, placing at Zone VIII and then meter the shadows to ensure the contrast is within latitude, processing accordingly (i.e. the Derrel swing method). The same might go for the first example, but I'd want to make sure the shadows aren't so compressed to require an excessive adjustment and decrease exposure until a 'conservative' contrast adjustment could be used.
The process is basically reverse for film, expose for the shadows process for the hilight, a-la-Adams. I do have a +-N system for raw files but it's not very practical, requires a lot of calibration, a lot of note taking and isn't very useful.
I'm pretty anal about precision. I don't think it makes me a better photography necessarily, but it certainly slows me down a lot. It is pretty impressive that you can do this all from an average reading, some people are just really good at seeing exposure. I'm not.
It's important that you remember to mention that what you are saying is the case if you leave the meter on center weighted, average or are using an incident meter. With spot metering you can place any reference into any zone.
In the case of the second example I would meter off the hilight, placing at Zone VIII and then meter the shadows to ensure the contrast is within latitude, processing accordingly (i.e. the Derrel swing method). The same might go for the first example, but I'd want to make sure the shadows aren't so compressed to require an excessive adjustment and decrease exposure until a 'conservative' contrast adjustment could be used.
The process is basically reverse for film, expose for the shadows process for the hilight, a-la-Adams. I do have a +-N system for raw files but it's not very practical, requires a lot of calibration, a lot of note taking and isn't very useful.
I'm pretty anal about precision. I don't think it makes me a better photography necessarily, but it certainly slows me down a lot. It is pretty impressive that you can do this all from an average reading, some people are just really good at seeing exposure. I'm not.