Derrel,
Your guess is as good as mine... The only camera I did not thoroughly research was the D40, but every review I read was positive - and the price was right. Initially I didn't want to spend over $400 total, so anything else was out of the question really.
Once I got over the intimidation and learned more about aperture, shutter speed and ISO I really started to dig photography like I thought I would. Adding a couple hundred dollars onto an investment is easier (to me) than just plopping down that extra $200 to begin with, especially when I'm not real sure where I'll go with it.
The D90 was always in my face though, but it was seriously over my budget. Everything up until the D90 was paid for with cash. I guess the 18 months/no interest lured me in and I finally got the 'right' camera.
For those that have never owned or shot with a D5000 before you can't begin to imagine how hard it is to pick between a d5000 and a D90. There are advantages to both, it's truly not a cut and dry decision to make.
Do I wish I still had the D300s, of course... but true to what I've posted here many times, I just can't justify the cost difference. There are people here more talented than I am, posting pictures I can only hope for at this point in time, and using technology that is 5 years older than what I have.
Funny you mention it though, Derrel... I almost started a thread along the lines of what you said. If it weren't for the Internet, how many of us would be content with out gear for a longer period of time? Without instant comparisons, latest information at your fingertips, 'Buy it Now' mentality, and 24/7 opinions from people who may or may not actually know fact from fiction.
I'm glad that most, if not all of my opinions/advice have been based on experience, and not just some random comment I read and passed along. I guess in some ways it's kind of nice to have the hands on knowledge of all those camera bodies.
I guess that about covers it...