WayneF
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2013
- Messages
- 622
- Reaction score
- 114
- Location
- Texas
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Thanks I've been watching beginner videos about how to use bounce flash, and how to use fill flash, flash diffusers, reflectors, manual mode, etc. and it seems that ttl is not very good, just like auto mode on the camera. Would it bet better to use ttl or just figure out how to use manual mode? I never realized there was this many variables that come into play when "shooting pictures" lol.
They are either wrong, or it may just be your understanding of what they said, but TTL is extremely good (overwhelmingly the modern way for on-camera flash), but TTL is just perhaps not always 100% precise. That subject is not really about TTL flash, but is about reflective metering, and apples to normal outdoor daylight snapshots as well as applies to the flash. If you shoot a primarily dark subject (meaning dark colors like black, not meaning the absence of light), reflective meters will overexpose it. If you shoot a primarily light subject (meaning light colors like white, not meaning lots of light on it), reflective meters will underexpose it. Every time. This is just how the reflective camera meter works. See How light meters work - So this is what the photographer does, he watches, and does what is necessary, when necessary.
TTL is great stuff, however beginners need to realize it is never fully point&shoot. Some slight attention is required. This is true of outdoor non-flash pictures too, never fully point&shoot. Reflective meters (camera meters) read the reflection from the variable subjects which fool the meter (whereas incident meters instead read the actual light falling on the subject). This is not a new subject, it was always true, it was this same way 50 years ago too.
So the cameras reflective meter is all that TTL flash has to use, and that reflective meter works the same way, with or without flash. It reads the reflection from variably reflecting subjects. We use exposure compensation to control what the ambient automation does, and we use flash compensation to control what the automatic flash does. That is what they are for, they are sometimes needed. In contrast, manual flash is probably never correct, since it does not even try, so we always have to adjust it. TTL is however a vastly closer starting point, normally quite close.
TTL is fantastic for walk around bounce flash, with changing subjects and exposures, etc... It simply just takes care of it automatically (pretty close, but sometimes slight adjustments are necessary - so we do need to pay attention). We could use manual flash mode for that, but every new situation requires manually adjusting the flash again (where TTL is mostly fully automatic). TTL is extremely faster to use.
For studio work, in umbrellas, etc (i.e., a fixed setup), the one setup works for all shots in that same fixed setup. Manual flash comes to advantage then, nothing changes except in the way we change them. Where if the subject turns their head, TTL flash metering might react with a small change. Also TTL is largely unworkable for more than just two lights (main and fill). So we use a handheld incident flash meter for multiple manual lights in the studio, and then manual stays the way we set them (full precise control, but manual).
A good speedlight choice will have a menu to select either TTL or Manual mode, for situations when you deem that necessary.
Last edited: