Keagle
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2007
- Messages
- 161
- Reaction score
- 0
- Location
- Gloucestershire, England
- Website
- www.kurtispoole.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Thank you for that chart usayit! That's gonna come in helpful.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yup - I'm going to call them tomorrow about rechipping. I had a look at the Bigma...but the lack of IS and it's weight puts me off, as I'm not the strongest guy.
I went out this morning, and at f/4 I was having shutter speeds of between 2 seconds and 1/5. I can just handhold 1/5 if I rest on my knee. However - my phone has f/2.8 (I think), so I grabbed that out and took a trail shot. The difference was amazing, so I'm gonna see if I can try out some faster glass and consider saving up.
Though I guess I could just bump up the ISO...
Though it would be cheaper overall to get the 100-400mm L, the f/5.6 is a bit worrying. Though that's what my current 70-210mm has.
I would think that you can get very good IQ with a 300, or any lens, with a conveter on it but are you then getting the same IQ (or a bit less) than just getting the 100-400?
no, the converter option is not as good as the 100-400 at 400, but still useable. the 100-400 is a bit soft at 400 as well though.
Why is the f/5.6 a concern on the 100-400 when you are talking about a possible converter on a 300 f/4?
I would think that you can get very good IQ with a 300, or any lens, with a conveter on it but are you then getting the same IQ (or a bit less) than just getting the 100-400?