3 for C&C, Bikini & Nudes, (NSFW)

[MarkCSmith]

#2 is the only one that stands out to me. The first one her skin tone blends into the background too much, she should stand out more. The black and white one is the same.

Keep shooting, she's a pretty girl and willing models can be hard to find especially nude.

 

[TheUndisputed]

WOW, it has been a while since I have been to this thread. Thanks for those who have posted.

I don't see the pornographic nature you guys see, maybe you who are speaking of this are porn deprived and need to look at it a little more often? I don't know. I do know that this is not the same nature of any soft pornographic shoot I have ever seen.

Like I said, thanks for the feedback.

 

[Invictus]

My opinion. Undisputed Took a beautiful picture, with a beautiful camera, of a beautiful lady. She is not bad looking at all. These Pictures are not pornographic. They are simply something beautiful that seems pornographic because it is taken in the stereotypical setting of a hotel/motel. If it was on a ribbon tapestry, it would be a little bit of a different thread.

 

[McQueen278]

In my opinion, they would be much more pleasing if they begged the question. Your backdrop isn't spectacular so you can overcome that by obscuring it more. Maybe move in closer. In doing this you will also reveal less of your model. This makes the viewer want to see more. It's amazing when you think about it, but people will stare at something as thought they can will it to reveal it's secrets. By reveal less, I don't necessarily mean less "erotic" material. You could have highlighted her individual features. Midsections are always a popular subject for artistic nudes. Often the face or eyes are obscured in artistic nudes which tends to make it less about the individual and more about either female or male form. If this stuff interests you, study famous works and decide what YOU like about them and try to apply it to your own work.