Eclipse Filters

Dale H. Cook

TPF Noob!
Joined
Oct 23, 2017
Messages
44
Reaction score
19
Location
Roanoke VA
Website
plymouthcolony.net
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
Tomorrow's annular solar eclipse reminds me that I need to ask about brands of eclipse filters for my K-70, as I am planning an overnight trip for next year's total eclipse. Are there any brands of eclipse filters that you would recommend, or any that you would suggest that I avoid?
 
Tomorrow's annular solar eclipse reminds me that I need to ask about brands of eclipse filters for my K-70, as I am planning an overnight trip for next year's total eclipse. Are there any brands of eclipse filters that you would recommend, or any that you would suggest that I avoid?
I used a DayStar solar filter for the last total eclipse. It worked great for the price. Since solar eclipses are typically once in a lifetime experience, no real need for an expensive filter, unless you are looking for professional quality.

 
Thanks for those links. I will probably be getting the Hoya ProND-100000, as Hoya is my preferred brand of filter and I can special order it from my local camera shop. I will be using it on either my smc Pentax-FA 35mm f/2 or my smc Pentax-DA 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3. In either case I will need a 62mm to 67mm step-up ring (which will be stored attached to the filter) because it is not available in 62mm. The 18-270mm has a 62mm thread. The 35mm has a permanently attached 49mm to 62mm step-up ring, and the hood is left permanently mounted on the 49mm thread behind the step-up ring. I find it most economical to use only 62mm filters (I owned the 18-270 first) on both lenses. Just for practice I need to point the K-70 at the moon with both lenses and with my smc Pentax-D FA Macro 100mm f/2.8, which I occasionally use for non-macro shots. I don't even want to consider buying a solar filter for my Rokinon 650Z 650-1300mm f/8-16 - a Hoya solar filter for its 95mm ring would cost about 2-1/2 times what it would cost for a 62mm.
 
I came to the photo forum looking for threads similar to this one. I was wondering if anyone got any pictures of the one that happened earlier today? (Well technically yesterday now)
 
With the April 8, 2024 total solar eclipse coming up I thought this thread might see a bit more traffic.

Here's what I found about filters. The ND filter is not recommended for solar photography or observation because it doesn't attenuate the invisible but highly damaging IR and UV from the sun. An ND 1000 filter is not nearly enough anyway, and not safe at all. No variable density filters either.

The nearly universal recommendation is to use real, "certified" solar filters, and the sheet stock seems to be the economical way to go. You can get a 10x10" sheet of the real solar filter material for about $20. You can cut your own camera filter, binoculars or telescope filter too. Sunglasses are useless here too, so the cardboard eclipse glasses are essential, and so cheap, why take a chance?

Do not try to use a typical sub $100 H-Alpha filter! Wrong tool for solar imaging, and not safe. The simply pass way to much spectrum. The correct H-Alpha filter is very expensive, and passes a tiny fraction of the spectrum that the cheaper H-Alpha filters do, and costs easily 12X as much. Not worth it for the only total eclipse you'll see in your lifetime.

Don't spend the eclipse looking at your camera either. The best viewing experiences have been reported by those using binoculars, and with the filters off during totality. Note: that's during totality only, and that lasts just a few minutes depending on location. Otherwise, binoculars need the filters!

Photographers should note that the corona visible during totality has about a 12-stop range, so bracket.

The usual cautions too: Don't look at the sun directly, ever. You must use the correct solar filter glasses or filters.
Don't point a camera at the sun, the intense energy will damage shutters, sensors, and other camera parts. Again, solar filters only.
Do not use a solar filter behind the lens, even if you have a lens with a filter stage.
When shooting an eclipse you'll need the filter in place for every stage except during totality, when you absolutely need to take it off.

And, apparently this has to be said...no flash needed, wanted, or appreciated by any other observers. Just no flash. None.

Best article I found:
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Back
Top