Rob
TPF Noob!
Ok, let's say that I might, just, consider buying a digital SLR and converting to the world of instant gratification. The thought alarms me considerably just typing this, after my last two digital disasters - Olympus C60 and Sony Mavica (floppy-disk-tastic).
But, as Matt said, I'm getting the arse with lab monkeys and getting everything on CD anyway, so..... maybe....
Anyway, enough prevarication, here's some questions you lovely people might be able to answer:
1) I've got loads of Nikon prime lenses, so the obvious incentive is to use them on it. I understand the smaller sensor increases the effective magnification, but by how much, also, is the light affected by a number of stops as well?
2) Will the camera's light meter work with the prime lenses? They are all old-fashioned Nikkor manual lenses: f1.2 50mm, f2.8 20mm, f1.8 100mm, f2.8 180mm
3) Can I therefore set the aperture on the lens and just take a picture normally as I would with my F3?
4) Should I just get the body, in light of the above lenses, or is it worth getting the kit lens as well? It's a difference of £200 in the UK, and it doesn't look like a £200 bit of glass.
5) Is the d70s £150 better than the d50? I can't seem to see much difference in the paper spec. Also the D100 is £400 more, is there much justification for the extra for an amateur?
Thanks in advance for the usual good advice.
Rob
But, as Matt said, I'm getting the arse with lab monkeys and getting everything on CD anyway, so..... maybe....
Anyway, enough prevarication, here's some questions you lovely people might be able to answer:
1) I've got loads of Nikon prime lenses, so the obvious incentive is to use them on it. I understand the smaller sensor increases the effective magnification, but by how much, also, is the light affected by a number of stops as well?
2) Will the camera's light meter work with the prime lenses? They are all old-fashioned Nikkor manual lenses: f1.2 50mm, f2.8 20mm, f1.8 100mm, f2.8 180mm
3) Can I therefore set the aperture on the lens and just take a picture normally as I would with my F3?
4) Should I just get the body, in light of the above lenses, or is it worth getting the kit lens as well? It's a difference of £200 in the UK, and it doesn't look like a £200 bit of glass.
5) Is the d70s £150 better than the d50? I can't seem to see much difference in the paper spec. Also the D100 is £400 more, is there much justification for the extra for an amateur?
Thanks in advance for the usual good advice.
Rob