Markw
No longer a newbie, moving up!
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2008
- Messages
- 4,057
- Reaction score
- 230
- Location
- Baltimore
- Website
- www.outsidetherainbow.com
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos NOT OK to edit
Soo..the D3100 looks fairly impressive as an entry-level camera. It will probably have the D5000 and D3000 sales hit rock bottom.
Other than that, the D90 replacement is looking promising. If it follows this:
as stated by Nikonrumors.com, it looks pretty enticing. We now know we can add to this list continuous AF in video mode.
What does everyone think about this? What can everyone bet the name will be? I know it hasnt been officially released, but I wouldnt have guessed the D3000 replacement would have been called the D3100. Who knows, maybe it could be something different like that? I cant see a D91 coming into play. D90s? D95? D900? Who knows?
What are your feelings of the initial, but fairly dated, news about this replacement?
Mark
Other than that, the D90 replacement is looking promising. If it follows this:
Magnesium-alloy body
16MP sensor
1080 HD video
Somewhere between 6-8 fps
Improved ISO range: 100-25600
39 AF points
Price: $1199 for body only
16MP sensor
1080 HD video
Somewhere between 6-8 fps
Improved ISO range: 100-25600
39 AF points
Price: $1199 for body only
as stated by Nikonrumors.com, it looks pretty enticing. We now know we can add to this list continuous AF in video mode.
What does everyone think about this? What can everyone bet the name will be? I know it hasnt been officially released, but I wouldnt have guessed the D3000 replacement would have been called the D3100. Who knows, maybe it could be something different like that? I cant see a D91 coming into play. D90s? D95? D900? Who knows?
What are your feelings of the initial, but fairly dated, news about this replacement?
Mark