Hi all, I currently own a 400D and I love taking landscape photos but I do also delve into other areas. After taking some long exposures I want something that can handle noise better at high ISO's so I'm wishing to upgrade but am torn in my decission, ideally I'd have the 5D MkII but with a £2k price tag I wont be going down that route for a while. I'm looking to spend around £1k and here are my options. 5D - £1100 Pros: Is a Professional model, I know it takes stunning pictures (depending on lens), Is sturdy and well built, Is a full frame camera. Cons: £1100 is a bit much, It's about 3 years old and is a bit dated, only uses the digic II processor, Cannot use my 10-20mm lens on it. 50D - £860 Pros: Is a brand new model out this month, Is the cheaper option, has 2.4MP more and can take photos at 6.3 fps, Uses the Digic IV processor, Has other new stuff like live view etc. Cons: It's only a semi-pro model, Has a 1.6 crop factor, Unsure on the photo quality as I don't know anyone with one to play with it for long enough. So.... taking that all into account what do you people reckon? A salesmen said to me today he recommended the 40D as there isn't a big jump to the 50D and the 40D is a fair bit cheaper... I know, never listen to the sales person but I just had a look and it's £563, £300 is £300 and not to be sniffed at I suppose.