The "C" in "Acquire"

Discussion in 'Off Topic Chat' started by manaheim, Feb 17, 2009.

  1. manaheim

    manaheim Jedi Bunnywabbit Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    14,394
    Likes Received:
    3,261
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Ok, here is the kinda thing that keeps me up at night. You wanna know what makes Chris Russo tick? Here it is, baby.

    Who the hell decided to put a "C" in the word "Acquire"?

    I mean seriously.

    Q is already the absolutely most pointless waste of synapse connections in my brain as it is. The letter, by itself, is worthless. It can only function when paired with another completely unrelated letter; "u". Even then, the letter pair only serves to act as a hard "c" sound, which really is also a total waste since that sound is very aptly handled by the letter "k".

    And yet... someone chose to stick a "c" in before the "qu". Why?

    WHY?!?!?!

    Therein my madness lay.
     
  2. Chris of Arabia

    Chris of Arabia Herding cats since 1988... Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2007
    Messages:
    7,825
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    The Magic Kingdom
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    akwire?
     
  3. Eldrich

    Eldrich TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Central PA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    I did...

    sorry, I didn't think it would upset anybody. I'll take it out.
     
  4. rufus5150

    rufus5150 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,658
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    From the Latin adquaerere which weaseled its way through the romance languages. At some point ad... becomes ac... (french? spanish retains the ad+...).
     
  5. manaheim

    manaheim Jedi Bunnywabbit Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    14,394
    Likes Received:
    3,261
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    yes! :)

    :lol:

    Unacceptable!!!! :lol:
     
  6. Eldrich

    Eldrich TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2008
    Messages:
    314
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Central PA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    must be the french, they're always trying to steal my ideas. see 'fries' and 'dip'
     
  7. rufus5150

    rufus5150 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,658
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    You mean:

    Unaceptable?
     
  8. manaheim

    manaheim Jedi Bunnywabbit Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    14,394
    Likes Received:
    3,261
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    Actually, unakseptabul. :)
     
  9. Corry

    Corry Flirtacious and Bodacious Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    Messages:
    21,169
    Likes Received:
    109
    Location:
    North Central Illinois
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    See, this is one thing I'm liking about German. For the most part, it's straighforward as far as pronunciation goes. No silent, or un-needed letters.
     
  10. Joves

    Joves No longer a newbie, moving up!

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2007
    Messages:
    2,399
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Flagstaff/Az
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    You mean like the u in colour for some.
     
  11. K8-90

    K8-90 TPF Noob!

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    937
    Likes Received:
    16
    Location:
    CANADA
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos OK to edit
    In an English high school class a couple years ago, we read a funny blurb on the english language that I think you would have appreciated... I couldn't find the exact one, but below is a similar article. It's long, but funny....

    "Because we are still bearing some of the scars of our brief skirmish with II-B English, it is natural that we should be enchanted by Mr. George Bernard Shaw's current campaign for a simplified alphabet.

    Obviously, as Mr. Shaw points out, English is in much need of a general overhauling and streamlining. However, our own resistance to any changes requiring a large expenditure of mental effort in the near future would cause us to view with some apprehension the possibility of some day receiving a morning paper in-to us-Greek.
    Our own plan would acheive the same end as the legislation proposed by Mr. Shaw, but in a less shocking manner, as it consists merely of an acceleration of the normal processes by which the language is continually modernized.
    As a catalytic agent, we would suggest that a National Easy Language Week be proclaimed, which the President would inaugurate, outlining some shortcut to concentrate on during the week, and to be adopted during the ensuing year. All school children would be given a holiday, the lost time being the equivalent of that gained by the spelling shortcut.
    In 1946, for example, we would urge the elimination of the soft "c", for which we would substitute "s". Sertainly, such an improvement would be selebrated in all sivic-minded sircles as being suffisiently worth the trouble, and students in all sities in the land would be reseptive toward any change eliminating the nesessity of learning the differense between the two letters.
    In 1947, sinse only the hard "c" would be left, it would possible to susbstitute "k" for it, both letters being pronounsed identikally. Imagine how greatly only two years of this prosess would klarify the konfusion in the minds of students. Already we would have eliminated an entire letter from the alphabet. Typewriters and linotypes kould all be built with one less letter and all the manpower and materials previously devoted to making "c's" kould be turned toward raising the national standard of living.
    In the fase of so many notable improvements, it is easy to foresee that by 1948 "National Easy Language Week" would be a pronounsed sukses. All skhool tshildren would be looking forward with konsiderable exsitement to the holiday, and in a blaze of national publisity it would be announsed that the double konsonant "ph" no longer existed, and that the sound would henseforth be written "f" in all words. This would make sutsh words as "fonograf" twenty persent shorter in print.
    By 1949, publik interest in a fonetik alfabet kan be expekted to have inkreased to the point where a more radikal step forward kan be taken without fear of undue kritisism. We would therefore urge the elimination at that time of all unesesary double leters, whitsh, although quite harmless, have always ben a nuisanse in the language and a desided deterent to akurate speling. Try it yourself in the next letter you write, and se if both writing and reading are not fasilitated.
    With so mutsh progres already made, it might be posible in 1950 to delve further into the posibilities of fonetik speling. After due konsideration of the reseption aforded the previous steps, it should be expedient by this time to spel al difthongs fonetikaly. Most students do not realize that the long "i" and "y", as in "time" and "by", are aktauly the difthong "ai", as it is writen in "aisle", and that the long "a" in "fate", is in reality the difthong "ei" as in "rein". Although perhaps not imediately aparent, the saving in time and effort wil be tremendous when we leiter elimineite the sailent "e", as meide posible bai this last tsheinge.
    For as is wel known, the horible mes of "e's" apearing in our writen language is kaused prinsipaly bai the present nesesity of indikeiting whether a vowel is long or short. Therefore, in 1951 we kould simply elimineit al sailent "e's", and kontinu to read and wrait merily along as though we wer in an atomik ag of edukation.
    In 1951 we would urg a greit step forward. Sins bai this taim it would have ben four years sins anywun had used the leter "c", we would sugest that the "National Easy Languag Wek" for 1951 be devoted to substitution of "c" for "th". To be sur it would be som taim befor peopl would have bekom akustomd to reading ceir newspapers and buks wic sutsh sentenses in cem as "Ceodor caught he had cre cousand cistls crust crough ce cik of his cumb".
    In ce saim maner, bai meiking eatsh leter hav its own sound and cat sound only, we kould shorten ce languag stil mor. In 1952 we would elimineit ce "y"; cen in 1953 we kould us ce leter to indikeit ce "sh" sound, cerbai klarifaiing words laik yugar and yur, as well as redusing bai wun mor leter al words laik "yut", "yore", and so forc. Cink, cen, of al ce benefits to be geind bai ce distinktion whitsh wil cen be meid between words laik:
    ocean - now writen - oyean
    machine - now writen - mayin
    racial - now writen - reiyial

    Al sutsh divers weis of wraiting wun sound would no longer exist, and whenever wun kaim akros a "y" sound he would know exaktli what to wrait. Kontinuing cis proses, year after year, we would eventuali have a reali sensibl writen languag. By 1975, wi ventyur tu sei, cer wud bi no mor uv ces teribli trublsum difikultis, wic no tu leters usd to indikeit ce seim nois, and laikwis no tu noises riten wic ce seim leter. Even Mr. Yaw, wi beliv, wud bi hapi in ce noleg cat his drims fainali keim tru."

    by Dolton Edwards from Isaac Asimov's "The Golden Years of Science Fiction" 4th Series
     
  12. Josh66

    Josh66 Been spending a lot of time on here!

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Messages:
    14,604
    Likes Received:
    1,236
    Location:
    Cedar Hill, Texas
    Can others edit my Photos:
    Photos NOT OK to edit
    ^^^
    ...too much to read in one post. (Just looking at it hurts my eyes...)

    The current spelling "seems right" to me. Anything else just seems wrong and pronounced differently.
     

Share This Page