CR88
TPF Noob!
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 38
- Reaction score
- 2
- Location
- Midwest
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
Hello all, recently I upgraded to a Nikon D750. It's my first full frame, well I briefly had a D600 but ran into the oil spots on the sensor issue so I returned it and held out until I could afford the 750. So, now my question is this; do I even keep my DX lenses, etc., or should completely abandon the DX format and sell off what I have to put money toward the purchase of my dream walk around lens? (24-70 Nikon 2.8, or Tamron equivalent.)
Originally I thought about keeping some DX lenses and picking up a refurbished D7100 so I have both formats.
To add a little more info, I recently purchased a Roland XR640 wide format printer and have considered adding photography, printing, framing, etc. to my business's digital and offset printing operations. So, I thought I may be able to use both formats. The DX for landscape and reaching out and the FX for product photography, low light and anything that really needed to be enlarged. In the past, before I purchased my business, I did wedding photography and other for hire type work so it seemed like a good opportunity to diversify.
If there is no need for DX, I could unload everything and focus on better glass for my FX. Between the the D200 body, DX lenses and maybe even my FX 24mm 2.8 Nikon prime I could probably get at least half of the money needed for the 24-70. Right now on the FX side, along with the 24mm 2.8 I also have a Nikon 50mm 1.4, and a Tamron 70-200 2.8.
Any input would be appreciated. Thanks!
Originally I thought about keeping some DX lenses and picking up a refurbished D7100 so I have both formats.
To add a little more info, I recently purchased a Roland XR640 wide format printer and have considered adding photography, printing, framing, etc. to my business's digital and offset printing operations. So, I thought I may be able to use both formats. The DX for landscape and reaching out and the FX for product photography, low light and anything that really needed to be enlarged. In the past, before I purchased my business, I did wedding photography and other for hire type work so it seemed like a good opportunity to diversify.
If there is no need for DX, I could unload everything and focus on better glass for my FX. Between the the D200 body, DX lenses and maybe even my FX 24mm 2.8 Nikon prime I could probably get at least half of the money needed for the 24-70. Right now on the FX side, along with the 24mm 2.8 I also have a Nikon 50mm 1.4, and a Tamron 70-200 2.8.
Any input would be appreciated. Thanks!