30 second exposure

[skiboarder72]

Took this the other night, actually got some of the motion of the clouds in it

 

[digital flower]

I'm just not seeing it




The picture that is :mrgreen:

 

[oldnavy170]

Me neither

 

[skiboarder72]

should be better now

 

[digital flower]

That's better.

The exposure is nice and the clouds are very cool. I would have liked to see a little more foreground.

 

[Jamiebear]

WOW!! I gotta try that!!!!

 

[Foffen]

I really like the clouds, but something more eyecatching in the foreground wouldn't mind here, imo.. But I think you got the lights and the clouds spot on. Nice work!

Fo

 

[Vivienne]

The clouds look awesome!
But I also think that there should be something more eyecatching in the foreground

 

[Battou]

What is your ISO on that? my thirty second exposures are not even in the same ball park with 800, in fact a tripple thirtysecond exposure had a hard time bringing some of the color.

 

[Mesoam]

first thing i thought of was Field Of Dreams

 

[marcuspeddle]

Nice technique. I suggest getting rid of the trees on the right (they seem like they are blocking the clouds' advance) and straightening the horizon.
Thanks for sharing.

 

[skiboarder72]

What is your ISO on that? my thirty second exposures are not even in the same ball park with 800, in fact a tripple thirtysecond exposure had a hard time bringing some of the color.

I believe it was on ISO 200... F3.5... a little levels work after, thanks

 

[S5guy]

nice, i have some empty fields like 15 miles away from me i will definitely try it with something eye catching in a corner

 

[Battou]

I believe it was on ISO 200... F3.5... a little levels work after, thanks

Ah, makes sence, I do some 90% of my shots at the minimum aprature possible per lens, you took yours at a considerably more open aprature than I.