50mm low light hand held please post samples

Norcalkid

TPF Noob!
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
First let me say hello. I am brand new to this forum and this is my first post.

I was hoping some of you would be willing to post some of your low light pics shot with a 50mm prime hand held. Would you please indicate weather it was the 1.4 or 1.8. or other. The reason I am asking is I am considering purchasing one. I would like to find something that I can just whip out and shoot in low light conditions. I know this isn’t ideal but I have to shoot on the fly. I’m not even sure if this is possible but the 50 seems to be the closest thing to what I am looking for and it is priced right.
The reason for the quick setup and shoot is because I chaperoned a high school trip threw Europe last summer. We where with 36 9-12 graders. Leading groups of kids obviously doesn’t leave much time to set up shots. And I sure didn’t have time to set up a tripod. Anyway the school is in the process of arranging another trip and I would like to take some reasonable shots of both cityscape and people with out the use of a flash at night. Is this the best choice of a lens? I am hoping some of you will be willing to post some examples.

PS I have a D80 with kit 18-135mm and I'm a total beginner.
 

tirediron

Watch the Birdy!
Staff member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
45,747
Reaction score
14,800
Location
Victoria, BC
Website
www.johnsphotography.ca
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
The 50mm 1.4 is your best choice for low-light photography in terms of aperture, but I don't think it's the most suitable for what you want. Don't forget, because of the APS-C sized sensor, that 50mm has an effective focal length of 75mm, or moderate telephoto. I would suggest that something like the Nikon 18-200 VR would be a much more suitable choice because of it's versatility. The built-in image stabilization will allow you to hand-hold at 2-4 stops slower than you could otherwise and the wide zoom range will allow you to from reasonably wide to long telephoto.

The 50mm 1.4 is a great, sharp lens, but not ideal, especially on a crop-body for a lot of day-to-day applications. I'm afraid I don't have any relevant images on-line that were taken with my 50.
 

DoshKel

TPF Noob!
Joined
May 4, 2007
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
Location
Florida
Can others edit my Photos
Photos NOT OK to edit
50mm 1.8 (no flash)

2912465789_2afb453e1d.jpg


2853977486_e3dea11d9f.jpg
 
OP
N

Norcalkid

TPF Noob!
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
The 50mm 1.4 is your best choice for low-light photography in terms of aperture, but I don't think it's the most suitable for what you want. Don't forget, because of the APS-C sized sensor, that 50mm has an effective focal length of 75mm, or moderate telephoto. I would suggest that something like the Nikon 18-200 VR would be a much more suitable choice because of it's versatility. The built-in image stabilization will allow you to hand-hold at 2-4 stops slower than you could otherwise and the wide zoom range will allow you to from reasonably wide to long telephoto.

The 50mm 1.4 is a great, sharp lens, but not ideal, especially on a crop-body for a lot of day-to-day applications. I'm afraid I don't have any relevant images on-line that were taken with my 50.


I would love to have an 18-200 VR. That is actually the lens that I originally wanted. But it is not cheap. 6-700 maybe a little less used. 50mm 1.8D $109 new on amazon. I figure I can pick one up for $50 or so on ebay. Maybe $150-200 for the 1.4D. If I could buy a 18-200 VR for that I would buy it in a heartbeat.

Thanks the responses. I would love to see a few more examples.
 

Most reactions

New Topics

Top