5DII Full Resolution Images

[Ls3D]

100 f/2.8 Macro $444 US After rebate - Review
I'm sure that 50 f/1.4 will impress as well..

 

[keith204]

keith, I'd be interested to know what lenses you are using for those particular shots that you can actually achieve the 5d's sharpness capabilities.

100 f/2.8 Macro $444 US After rebate - Review

Most were taken with the 100 f/2.8, but today the 50 f/1.4 also provided some great shots in the few times I used it. This picture was with the 50 f/1.4:


I'm now realizing the power of primes. With a 21mp camera, it seems like the sharpness of the lens becomes a bit more noticeable.

 

[roentarre]

The details are just amazing. Impeccable.

 

[frXnz kafka]

Holy god, my screen size is 1024x768, and your pictures are still retarded big... What's the point unless you're going to make posters out of every one?

1024x768? That's tiny by today's standards.

 

[Sw1tchFX]

LOL I busted out laughing at the amount of detail in these pictures.

HOLY COW!

When used in an environment where the photographer has time to control the situation eg/ landscape and studio work, the Canon files are just awesome to work with. If I worked in a studio, I doubt i'd shoot Nikon.

However, I think for photography on the go, the Nikon ergonomics kick butt.

When I was living in Seattle, i'd regularly shoot with 5D's and 30D's. They were OK to work with, but when I got home to work on the files, it reminded me why I didn't use my D70 instead, even though it might be easier to work with.



EDIT:

Out of curiosity, how is the 24-105 on the 5DII? is it ok at f/4?

 

[keith204]

LOL I busted out laughing at the amount of detail in these pictures.

HOLY COW!

When used in an environment where the photographer has time to control the situation eg/ landscape and studio work, the Canon files are just awesome to work with. If I worked in a studio, I doubt i'd shoot Nikon.

However, I think for photography on the go, the Nikon ergonomics kick butt.

When I was living in Seattle, i'd regularly shoot with 5D's and 30D's. They were OK to work with, but when I got home to work on the files, it reminded me why I didn't use my D70 instead, even though it might be easier to work with.



EDIT:

Out of curiosity, how is the 24-105 on the 5DII? is it ok at f/4?

This Zoolander impression is with the 24-105 at f/4.

[normal] [original]

 

[Prophet]

Definately not as sharp!

-JD-