What's new

70-200mm f2.8 lens

Psytrox

TPF Noob!
Joined
May 29, 2011
Messages
150
Reaction score
15
Location
Norway
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
Hello,

I've been thinking about increasing my veriaty of lenses. I have been looking at the 70-200mm f2.8 for my D7000. Nikkor, Sigma and Tamron has this lens. And ofcourse Nikkor is the most expencive one. I was just wondering if anyone has any expeience with these 3 lenses. Pro's and con's or any advice on which one to chose?
 
If you have the money buy the Nikkor and don't even think about it. The VR-I and VR-II are both better than either off brand lens from all that I've read. The Sigma is probably then the next choice then the Tamron. I've done a fair amount of research on them but I haven't used them so this is just opinion based off all the info I've gathered.
 
Look for a used Nikon (VRI not the II) for ~$1300 and save. The VRI is just as good on a DX body optically.
 
:thumbup: for a very long time, the 80-200 2.8 was my walking around, rarely off the camera. Loved that lens, and there are times I wonder why i up graded.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
love the nikon 70-200 vr II. wouldnt think about selling it. it blows the sigma 70-200 hsm II out of the water.
 
If warranty is a factor get the Sigma....the EX models have a 4 year warranty

If your willing to roll the dice the nikon it is the better lens but you need to find one still in warranty.

I too was in the money boat when I got mine....I got a Sigma 70-200 OS new in box from my local camera shop and it has been awsome.
 
Not exactly a big variaty of answeres, which is good. I'll save up a little extra and get the nikkor lens :)

Thanks for all the replies
 
If warranty is a factor get the Sigma....the EX models have a 4 year warranty

If your willing to roll the dice the nikon it is the better lens but you need to find one still in warranty.

I too was in the money boat when I got mine....I got a Sigma 70-200 OS new in box from my local camera shop and it has been awsome.

I wouldn't pay much extra for a warranty, pro glass is extremely reliable unless you abuse it (which would void the warranty).

Stick with Nikon, and go for the 80-200mm if you can't quite afford the 70-200mm.
 
The Nikon 70-200 vrii is arguably one of the best models in the 70-200 class but you pay for that greatness. Sigma would probably be next choice.
 
The Nikon 70-200 vrii is arguably one of the best models in the 70-200 class but you pay for that greatness. Sigma would probably be next choice.

True dat - but its no lack of cost and lack of that greatness/performance you suggested. I enjoy the warp speed focus, best optics available, VRII taking pics at 200mm at much slower shutter speeds, etc etc

Now the Sigma 50mm 1.4 blows the Nikkor/Canon 50mms away, but its bigger, heavier and cost more. I stilled recently chucked one in the bag
 
The Nikon 70-200 vrii is arguably one of the best models in the 70-200 class but you pay for that greatness. Sigma would probably be next choice.

True dat - but its no lack of cost and lack of that greatness/performance you suggested. I enjoy the warp speed focus, best optics available, VRII taking pics at 200mm at much slower shutter speeds, etc etc

Now the Sigma 50mm 1.4 blows the Nikkor/Canon 50mms away, but its bigger, heavier and cost more. I stilled recently chucked one in the bag

Yeah the sigma stuff is a bit bulky but the IQ is insane. I picked up a 17-50 f2.8 and do not regret spending the extra money for it over the tamron. Crystal clear and with the hsm its really fsat and super quiet. I was shocked at how quiet it really is.
 
I have the Tamron and am really liking it so far. But I wont hesitate to admit if I had the cash I would have picked up the Nikon version. I'm still happy with my purchase though.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom