A couple of my baby girl. Opinions please

[Mikeyb90]

#1
View attachment 35559

#2
View attachment 35558

#3


#4


#5


#6


#7


#8

 

[tirediron]

A bit more than a couple... As there are rather too many for which to provide detailed critique, general observations are that they appear to range from moderately to significantly under-exposed, and are framed rather too tightly. For best results, post no more than four images in 'C&C' posts.

 

[412 Burgh]

Too dark and wayyy underexpose for my liking. She looks like she has a redish tint to her skin tone. I'm assuming the wb is causing this or it's the underexposure.

 

[cgipson1]

As mentioned, your white balance is off, and these shots are underexposed.

A quick edit so you can see the difference... I corrected white balance, brought exposure up a bit, dodged the feet to lighten them up, and then color balanced a little more for better skin tone.

Edit is on top.. original on bottom


Looks like you need to move a bit farther away... that flash is way to localized, need to spread it out some... See how it is concentrated on the feet, and falls off as you get farther away from the feet?

 

[KrisztinaK]

that flash is way to localized, need to spread it out some... See how it is concentrated on the feet, and falls off as you get farther away from the feet?

I wonder if that is vignetting applied in post process?

 

[Mikeyb90]

that flash is way to localized, need to spread it out some... See how it is concentrated on the feet, and falls off as you get farther away from the feet?

I wonder if that is vignetting applied in post process?

I used a gradient tool to help smooth out the background. Thanks for your opinions everyone. This is the first portrait photography I've done. And with very little equipment :/