A few for more C&C please :D

[Ajlista]

Well, just got back from p.a with new pictures
All critiques are welcome
1.

2.

3.

4.

 

[Ajlista]

Anyone?

 

[C C]

i really am not one to critique but if i could i would edit the 1st one to look old/rustic

 

[Propsguy]

You may not be getting many responses because these photos don't invoke an emotional response... they are just snapshots. Perhaps some post processing would stir the pot a little...

 

[MissCream]

Your settings are so messed up. The fence picture is ISO 400 1/2000 f4. What were you trying to accomplish with that photo?

 

[NCAFLeo88]

they are all just kinda random and bleh....nothing spectacular really....sry

 

[wlbphoto]

Well these are random and they do look like snapshots try to think beyond the just point and shoot get creative .. other then that keep shooting.

 

[Stryker]

Your settings are so messed up. The fence picture is ISO 400 1/2000 f4. What were you trying to accomplish with that photo?

Yeah, and the bridge pic was done at ISO 400, 1/1600, f/5. F1 and MotoGP shots are done between 1/500 and 1/1500. I suggest you lower the ISO and bump up the aperture between 5.6 and 8 to slow down the shutter speed to 1/200 if shooting static subjects or landscapes like those in your photos.

 

[Forkie]

Your settings are so messed up. The fence picture is ISO 400 1/2000 f4. What were you trying to accomplish with that photo?

How do you see the EXIF data on these photos? I can't work out how you know that!

 

[Stryker]

Hi Forkie. you can download the Free Photo Viewer from download.cnet.com.

Once you have this freeware, you download the photo and view it at free photo viewer and you'll see the EXIF

 

[Jarmo]

1.
Use more shallow depth of field to isolate the subject. Right now there are too many.
2.
Maybe change the angle a bit so that fence goes from corner to corner. Also the snow is blown out.
3.
A macro lense could possibly bring out some interesting details in the bark.
4.
If possible shoot from a prependicular angle. Maybe try long exposure times to make the water look more interesting.

 

[Forkie]

Thanks Stryker. I shall do that when I get home.

 

[MissCream]

Your settings are so messed up. The fence picture is ISO 400 1/2000 f4. What were you trying to accomplish with that photo?

How do you see the EXIF data on these photos? I can't work out how you know that!

Depends on what internet browser you have. I dont have to download pictures, I just right click on them and select view exif data. Just google EXIF data viewer for whatever browser you use

 

[Forkie]

Your settings are so messed up. The fence picture is ISO 400 1/2000 f4. What were you trying to accomplish with that photo?

How do you see the EXIF data on these photos? I can't work out how you know that!

Depends on what internet browser you have. I dont have to download pictures, I just right click on them and select view exif data. Just google EXIF data viewer for whatever browser you use

WOOOOOOOOOWWWWW! I had no idea such a thing existed. Just downloaded it - what a fab little gadget!

 

[Ajlista]

Thanks guys Sorry for the late response
You dont have to be sorry for your input if they are bad, i post them cause i want to know stuff like that
As for my iso, i usually keep it on auto
Thanks for the critique