What's new

Amelia

tirediron

Watch the Birdy!
Staff member
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
45,715
Reaction score
14,785
Location
Victoria, BC
Can others edit my Photos
Photos OK to edit
From yesterday's session... C&C always appreciated.

Amelia.jpg
 
Hey John, I think there may be an eye lash out of place...Stunning
 
Pretty model :)

It looks a little bit flat and dark though when looking at the histogram. The lighting in the photo really seems like it would be more suited to a brighter processing.
$Amelia.webp
 
  • Thread Starter 🔹
  • Moderator 🛠️
  • #5
Pretty model :)

It looks a little bit flat and dark though when looking at the histogram. The lighting in the photo really seems like it would be more suited to a brighter processing.
View attachment 64860
Hmm... I was going for a softer, more dreamy look with this one, but your edit has possibilities too.
 
I liked the softer dreamy look. Kinda angelic. Ed
 
Unfortunately the treatment looked (to me) to be more a mistake or lighting/exposure issues. So, it didn't quite work for me.
 
  • Thread Starter 🔹
  • Moderator 🛠️
  • #8
I think it's because, with the current treatment, the lighting seems kind of flat. It's not really flat though, because there are soft shadows on the cheeks and under her chin.

And the background is very dark, which I don't think works for the look you were going for. Maybe a brighter exposure on the background, or use a single background light right behind her to cause a vignette around the edges.

Just my thoughts. I'm not very good at assessing softer photos (I just love that contrast) so.... :P
 
  • Thread Starter 🔹
  • Moderator 🛠️
  • #10
I think it's because, with the current treatment, the lighting seems kind of flat. It's not really flat though, because there are soft shadows on the cheeks and under her chin.

And the background is very dark, which I don't think works for the look you were going for. Maybe a brighter exposure on the background, or use a single background light right behind her to cause a vignette around the edges.

Just my thoughts. I'm not very good at assessing softer photos (I just love that contrast) so.... :P
Did you mean rim light her?
 
I think it's because, with the current treatment, the lighting seems kind of flat. It's not really flat though, because there are soft shadows on the cheeks and under her chin.

And the background is very dark, which I don't think works for the look you were going for. Maybe a brighter exposure on the background, or use a single background light right behind her to cause a vignette around the edges.

Just my thoughts. I'm not very good at assessing softer photos (I just love that contrast) so.... :P
Did you mean rim light her?

I think that would work as well to get the angelic look you're going for. :)

What I was meaning though is to use a small light behind her to cause a kind of radial gradient behind her.
 
  • Thread Starter 🔹
  • Moderator 🛠️
  • #12
I think it's because, with the current treatment, the lighting seems kind of flat. It's not really flat though, because there are soft shadows on the cheeks and under her chin.

And the background is very dark, which I don't think works for the look you were going for. Maybe a brighter exposure on the background, or use a single background light right behind her to cause a vignette around the edges.

Just my thoughts. I'm not very good at assessing softer photos (I just love that contrast) so.... :P
Did you mean rim light her?

I think that would work as well to get the angelic look you're going for. :)

What I was meaning though is to use a small light behind her to cause a kind of radial gradient behind her.
Gotcha!
 
aaaaaaactually, I just realized I was viewing this on my craptastic monitor. I moved it. It's better. Not so much underexposed as not having a very big range of contrast, which I think is what rex is saying.

I think.

I'm sick, so ignore me.
 
  • Thread Starter 🔹
  • Moderator 🛠️
  • #14
aaaaaaactually, I just realized I was viewing this on my craptastic monitor. I moved it. It's better. Not so much underexposed as not having a very big range of contrast, which I think is what rex is saying.

I think.

I'm sick, so ignore me.

All righty then... ;)
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

Back
Top Bottom