Are "beginner DSLRs" purely about the money?

[DennyCrane]

The body is almost irrelevant. The big decision is what system you're buying into, and apparently, he's decided upon Nikon. So be it. As we all know, bodies come and go, but you keep the lenses. I'd recommend a basic body, start learning the basic techniques, and if there's desire to expand, then build up the lenses. Then, if there's still interest to grow, sell off the body and get a high end one.

I can't remember ever hearing someone say "Wow, that shot is great... you must have used an XXXX body for the shot!". The photographer is the most important thing, then the lens, then the body.

 

[jaomul]

Just a thought but if someone starts with a camera such as a D3 and can shoot usable shots at ISO fifty million from day one the learning curve may just be at the top, but the along the way basics might get lost

 

[Ballistics]

The photographer is the most important thing, then the lens, then the body.

I disagree, I see it as the otherway around. What is the greatest photographer in the world without a camera? If I had the money I would go for a full framed body and a good lens from day one.
A photographer has only the ability to get better, while the equipment has it's limitations. Getting a camera/lens you never have to upgrade is probably the greatest thing for a beginner because it lets them focus on one thing, their ability. 2 months and they will learn enough to make great pictures. If the money is there, go for it.