I am an old-school guy, I use D-76, Kodak indicator stop-bath, Kodak Fixer and Kodak Hypo-Clear, and Kodak Photo-Flo wetting agent.
Is it the best? Dunno, but all of it is made in the USA and I like keeping jobs here.
I am afraid, that now this stuff is made in Germany. By Tetenal.
Well, there goes that perfectly good theory!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks for letting me know (insert sad trombone face).
Heck, most of these chemicals are easy enough to just mix them yourself from scratch.
Kodak D-76 Film Developer
Eh... Stop using that and try something else, there is a lot of stuff. And yes, D76 , no doubt, is "old school". LOL.
It was created in late twenties for motion picture industry. And failed. But what you do with tones already mixed powders ? You sell it, really cheap, to still photography suckers. But it turned out as a very good developer for pre-war emulsions and legend was born. Funny thing, top artists of that time didn't use it. There was already better stuff. Ever heard of panthermic 777 ? Magnum agency was using this almost exclusively. Since then emulsions changed enormously. No more need for developers overloaded with chemicals. Eventually even Kodak started to market for it's top of the line emulsions, top of the line ready to use developer, Tmax Dev.
You might be surprised, how little chemistry is required to develop Tmax 100 way better, than D76 can ever do. Actually D76 is not really good idea for TMX. I don't use TriX, but I use DXN, very similar emulsion, which, unlike TriX, is supposedly unchanged since fifties. Maybe. But original TriX doesn't exist anymore, emulsion was changed to the point, that Kodak changed the designation to TX. Negative looks still the same, but TX is a modern, thin layer, small grain (for ISO 400 film) emulsion.
Well, old books is fun to read, but methods described in them are not always valid nowadays.
Anyway, try Tmax Dev. Or HC110 in small bottles. Those were still made in Rochester. By Canadian company, but in USA.