- Joined
- Apr 9, 2009
- Messages
- 41,401
- Reaction score
- 5,706
- Location
- Iowa
- Can others edit my Photos
- Photos OK to edit
A Bayer filter doesn't diminish sharpeness, the AA (Anti-Alias) filter does that.
o hey tyler said:I'm sorry dude, I respect you as a forum member and I have no beef with you, but I can't see how this makes sense.
Really, with a Leica, you're paying for design. I'm not talking engineering wise, I'm talking about the visual aesthetics of the camera chassis. There's no reason that I can fathom to spend more money on a feature-stripped camera.
Price is important to a lot of people. Leica is notorious for exorbitant prices for their gear. The fact that they're taking steps towards a B&W only digital camera and it's more expensive than an M9... It just seems dumb.
Do you use Apple if so same thing applies

o hey tyler said:I'm sorry dude, I respect you as a forum member and I have no beef with you, but I can't see how this makes sense.
Really, with a Leica, you're paying for design. I'm not talking engineering wise, I'm talking about the visual aesthetics of the camera chassis. There's no reason that I can fathom to spend more money on a feature-stripped camera.
Price is important to a lot of people. Leica is notorious for exorbitant prices for their gear. The fact that they're taking steps towards a B&W only digital camera and it's more expensive than an M9... It just seems dumb.
Do you use Apple if so same thing applies
o hey tyler said:I'm sorry dude, I respect you as a forum member and I have no beef with you, but I can't see how this makes sense.
Really, with a Leica, you're paying for design. I'm not talking engineering wise, I'm talking about the visual aesthetics of the camera chassis. There's no reason that I can fathom to spend more money on a feature-stripped camera.
Price is important to a lot of people. Leica is notorious for exorbitant prices for their gear. The fact that they're taking steps towards a B&W only digital camera and it's more expensive than an M9... It just seems dumb.
Do you use Apple if so same thing applies
Clearly a PC user, Apples mac's don't just look nice as people say often. They actually have a much higher standard of build quality and are almost silent in operation and I am not biased, I hate apple as a company and have work with PC's in my job! So, Gary you prefer Canon, Film and using PC'S? i get the picture now!![]()
This is only partially correct. Roughly 2/3 smartphones are androids. iOS only takes roughly 20%. The difference is apple monopolizes their iOS where android is shared among several major manufacturers. It's more an issue of free trade versus a monopoly as to why apple has squeezed more out of smart phones which quite often have been well behind on processing power.Derrel said:That's why the iPhone dominates the smart phone market
This is only partially correct. Roughly 2/3 smartphones are androids. iOS only takes roughly 20%. The difference is apple monopolizes their iOS where android is shared among several major manufacturers. It's more an issue of free trade versus a monopoly as to why apple has squeezed more out of smart phones which quite often have been well behind on processing power.Derrel said:That's why the iPhone dominates the smart phone market
A Bayer filter doesn't diminish sharpeness, the AA (Anti-Alias) filter does that.
That's kind of what I was expecting - that it would be basically just like shooting film, but digital.From the article:
[...] Equally, anyone who has got used to producing mono images by converting color images, with all the selective color mixing that brings, will have to get used to pulling the correct color filter out of their camera bag at the point of capture.
Theoretically, removing the bayer filter should give u three times better low light performance, 1.5 stops. Although i don't see how luminance sharpness would be improved.
I used to do my own ink jet printing at home (long time ago when I actually had time to burn) and an acquaintance of mine explained to me digital photographer's tendency to over sharpen the photos on-screen. It became obvious as that on-screen image was made into a print. His eye and experience goes way back to the days of floor level enlargers which makes him especially acute to seeing these images. He showed me that the only "real" way to get a good print out of a digital image is to adjust, print, examine at proper viewing distance and conditions. Repeat. Time consuming and expensive but very rewarding in a subtle way. I can see people like him with very particular and discriminating tastes going for a monochrome sensor (note I am not saying the leica Monochrome... any properly done monochrome sensor). These are the same people that would love to spend thousands on exotic glass to strive for the finest of details...